×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IEC 61511 - suitability of a contactor for a SIF

IEC 61511 - suitability of a contactor for a SIF

IEC 61511 - suitability of a contactor for a SIF

(OP)
Hi All

Basic question - what is the basis under which a power contactor is permitted to be used in a SIF to IEC 61508/IEC 61511

The standards require that all components used in the SIS are either certified to IEC 61508 or are determined to be proven in use.

Surely everyone who uses a power contactor in their SIS isn't making a proven in use justification?

Thanks

Michael

RE: IEC 61511 - suitability of a contactor for a SIF

I think Allen Bradly makes some contactors that are "Safety" rated....It's been a long time for me, so I'm not sure if that's the right name for them. I know they make a line of relays that are rated for SIL use.

But I think these contactors are very small...and maybe repurposed relays.

I would think you'd be able to calculate the reduction rate by using the MTBF of the contactor.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: IEC 61511 - suitability of a contactor for a SIF

This document might help a little - it's obviously intended for ABB's own products, but I suspect the data it contains isn't atypical for components of the same general type.

Unfortunately it refers you to the awful IEC 13849 standard which replaced the altogther more usable EN 954 machinery safety standard.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close