×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

(OP)
Hi All,
Just got our SI interpretive report back for one of my projects. Geotech is recommending a raft slab on grade. He has calculated 43mm potential settlement. Loads on columns are 1000kN. I can't understand why he's not recommending piling and avoid any potential settlement. Any comments welcome.

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

I would agree with you.

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

I would put the question back on the geotech.

Normally they're pretty keen guys when it comes to what works on a given site. Maybe the area is full of cobbles and boulders making the installation of piles difficult.

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

The raft will be at grade level? Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of a raft foundation? You may want to clarify that/get confirmation.

If the top of foundation does indeed need to be deeper......I'd do a cost comparison: it's been my experience with a (actual) raft foundation that once you get done with the excavation and so forth.....you'd be better off doing piles (as the others have suggested; if possible).

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

(OP)
Hi WARose,

Just to clarify the raft is on grade...not at grade.

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

Not sure I understand either of the last posts. To me "on grade" and "at grade" are essentially the same. And why would a raft slab be illogical on/at grade?
I still think 43 mm settlement is a bit much for a 4 story building. Perhaps the geotech can further expound on this advice.

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

(OP)
Just to clarify so guys. On grade to me just means sitting on the ground at finished floor level.

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

Quote:

(hokie66)

And why would a raft slab be illogical on/at grade?

Because that isn't the objective of a true raft foundation. Granted people use the terms raft and mat interchangeably (and that may be the case here)......but a true raft foundation is used where the soil has low allowable bearing pressure (or potential settlement issues) and (as a result) the soil is excavated down to a level where the weight of the structure is balanced by the weight of the soil removed. (I.e. you are not significantly increasing the net bearing pressure.)

Ergo your top of concrete elevation is well below adjacent grade level. You've made yourself a basement. That's why I brought up cost because it gets pretty expensive.

So when he said there were some issues with the soil at the site and he was using a raft.....that is what I envisioned.....but apparently this is not the case. (I.e. it's just a regular mat with the top of concrete near (adjacent) grade.)

RE: Raft slab supporting 4 storey building

I've seen it used interchangeably everywhere. Even in texts. Gupta (in his book: 'Raft Foundation Design And Analysis With A Practical Approach', p.6-7) refers to the situation as a "buoyancy raft".

Coduto (in 'Foundation Design Principals and Practices', 2nd edition, p.647) provides this historical perspective:

"The earliest documented floating foundation was for the Albion Mill, which was built on a soft soil in London around 1780. It had about 50 percent flotation (i.e. the excavation reduced Δσ'z by 50 percent) and, according to Farley (1827), "the whole building would have floated upon it, as a ship floats in water." In spite of this pioneering effort, floating foundations did not become common until the early twentieth century. Early examples include the Empress Hotel in Victoria, British Columbia, 1912; the Ohio Bell Telephone Company Building in Cleveland, 1925; and the Albany Telephone Building in Albany, New York, 1929."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources