×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

(OP)
Hello everyone,

I have a pressure vessel designed to the ASME code and stamped for lethal service (L-stamp) it has been operating for over two decades with no real problems but during a recent shutdown and inspection it was discovered that an inlet/outlet pipe was not attached with a full penetration weld but with a single sided fillet weld on the outside. Obvious this is a huge code violation because all welds in a lethal service system needs to be full penetration to reduce the risk of a weld failing and releasing lethal chemicals into the air/environment and possibly causing serious harm/death to personnel.

My question is if we want to deactivate the system should we cross out (score out) the L-stamp to signify that this vessel is no longer rated for lethal service (because it was never correctly build).

Also, if we want to continue using this vessel after fixing the code violation (Via cutting out the fillet welds and making them full penetration, and going through the process of R-stamping it) is it alright to leave the original L-stamp on the nameplate?

Thank you for your insight,
Tyler

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

Just out of curiosity, what do the design drawings show for the weld ? Were the drawings PE stamped ?

Or, was the vessel constructed in accordance with the design drawings ?

What about the U-1 data report ? Is the sheet signed by an authorized inspector ?

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

(OP)
MJCronin, I believe the drawings had full penetration welds on it.

My reasoning on why it didn't get welded correctly is because there are components inside the vessel that would make it almost impossible to weld correctly and that the welder was just lazy. We have a few vessels with this problem and you can see him "attempting" the correct weld on one of the vessels then giving up and doing only external fillet welds on the rest.

The vessel was inspected and signed off per the U-1 data report.

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

1) Try to contact with the fabricator and the authorized inspector that signed the report (exist?)
2) Contact an lawyer

Regards
r6155

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

What is an L-stamp? Never heard of that.

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

The nameplate requires the letter L stamped on it when the vessel is intended for lethal service.

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

I know, but I wasnt aware of any stamping requirement. I only know of the actual ASME Certification Mark to be stamped, but I guess the OP meant the nameplate bears the letter L as per UG-116(c).

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

Lethal service is a serius problem, some people are irresponsible: fabricator, authorized inspector, and others to be investigated. The irresponsibles must be sanctioned.

Regards
r6155

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

Revision to an ASME nameplate is prohibited. Your option would be to have an NB R-Stamp nameplate attached to the PV to indicate new design conditions, an alteration from original. However, I would first check with the regulatory body, if applicable, or insurer before doing anything.

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

Quote:

My reasoning on why it didn't get welded correctly is because there are components inside the vessel that would make it almost impossible to weld correctly and that the welder was just lazy.

As I thought more about the above.... was this inlet/outlet pipe added after the vessel was constructed/stamped and placed in-service, especially for a 20 year period? I would think that during original fabrication, the inlet/outlet pipe would have been done without vessel internals. I suppose anything is possible but it does seem rather odd to me.

RE: ASME BPVC Lethal Service requirements

I agree with r6155 and metengr ..... This could get legal really fast.

ASME rules are hard and fast.

Unlike house plans, pressure vessel drawings and U-1 reports are legal documents and not design suggestions ..... especially for vessels stamped for LETHAL SERVICE.

If modifications were made after the vessel was in service, then the Repair Stamp rules apply.

We are dealing with serious safety issues here ..... IMHO, incomplete welds on a vessel are like putting a bullet in the chamber of a gun

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources