×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

A scaled finite element model
2

A scaled finite element model

A scaled finite element model

(OP)
Hello! I have a question that I would like to share with you. Although there is little chance to encounter this problem in practice, I think it is good for a structural engineer to pause and ponder about it for a few seconds. For me, it is actually a real-life problem. Here it goes:

- Let's suppose we have a simple reinforced concrete portal frame subjected to a ground motion record (one story, one bay). There is a lumped mass M at the beam level. Let's assume the story height is 3 m and the bay width is 6 m.

Now,
for some reason, I want to numerically model a scaled version of the frame, which has a story height 2 m, bay width 4 m and cross sections down-scaled accordingly. How should I model the mass and the ground motion record? Will the mass be increased/decreased? Will the ground motion remain the same, or should I scale the time and/or acceleration? Let's say that the same material properties are used in both the model and the real portal frame.

The purpose is to have the deformations scaled with the same scale factor applied to the geometry (i.e., the resulting deformations in the model should be scaled by 2/3).

I don't know the answer, that's why I am asking you. Nevertheless, I am writing here some of my ideas that could lead to an answer:
1) I think this is somehow analogous to laboratory testing of scale specimens (for example in a shaking table).
2) I think we should apply some "similitude law". For example, the Cauchy-Froude law.
Any idea how to actually do this?

RE: A scaled finite element model

This is way back in the sands of time for me, but I think the first step would be to list all input and response parameters for the full-sized problem and determine a reduced set of non-dimensional parameters from Buckingham's Pi Theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckingham_%CF%80_th...). Then for the reduced model, you would set some parameters based on your reduced scale and adjust others (like the added mass and ground motion intensity) to have the non-dimensional parameters the same in both full-size and reduced.

I think you would get some interesting parameters for this... ratio of natural frequencies in terms of density, lumped mass, A, I... plus the fact that your response isn't a single value but a time-history. All this to say... have fun!

RE: A scaled finite element model

for scaling, keep the building frequency the same = sqrt (k/m), and scale mass. k is the frame stiffness, and I/L^3 should be proportional.

RE: A scaled finite element model

(OP)
Thank you for your answers. I don't know why, but think I had never heard of the Buckingham's Pi Theorem. I didn't go through it in detail but it seems complicated. I keep believing that there is a simpler solution. For instance, if someone has experience with the application of Similitude laws (such as the Cauchy-Froude law), it would be very helpful. Keeping the frequencies the same violates the Cauchy-Froude similitude law (if I am not mistaken). The law says that in a scaled model, the time is scaled by the square root of the scale factor. Now, I don't know what that means. Is it the period of the structure that is scaled? Is it the time in the input accelerogram? Any idea?

RE: A scaled finite element model

I've probably got more sands and more time working against me than has ChadV, but FWIW his suggestion of Buckingham's Pi Theorem is the same approach I would take.  I'll even go so far as to say that most similitude laws reflect Buckingham, directly or indirectly.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources