×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Doubler Plate design for beam web

Doubler Plate design for beam web

Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
Hi,

I have a situation where I need to splice the existing beam. I cannot add flange plates due to construction restraints and need to transfer the splice forces through the beam web splice plate only. The tension force is 300k and the beam web is 0.5''. Beam web does not work for block shear strength. So I am planning to add doubler plate at the web to account for thicker web. Any inputs? Is there any resources out there which talks about the design?

Thanks

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

So the load transferred is predominately axial then? I might need a sketch in order to get the gist of this but, as I consider it now, I'm having a hard time imagining how doubler plates would help with this. Once you transfer the loads into the doubler plates, would you not be left with the same block shear issue at the web? How much web length are you able to access on either side of your splice? Can you weld stuff to the inside of the existing flanges at all?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

maybe nest angles on the inside of the flanges and the web ?

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

if "tension" is axial load, then any area of the beam can carry it. Traditionally we use the caps, but if the splice is on the web then there'll be some shear lag load transfer from the caps into the web splice.

if you wanted to be "sexy" about the design you could make the splice plate as a "fish mouth", tapering towards the ends, as the load gradually shears from the caps to the splice.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

rb1957, what do you mean by "caps"? Flanges?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
@ Ktook

Adding doubler plate make the web thickness larger thus helping the block shear. Am I missing something here?

The force is around 500kips tension. Web alone is sufficient for 350kips. Adding doubler plate on both sides of the web, increases the web thickness thus block shear capacity. The weld around the double plate will be designed to resist all 500kips of force.

Yes, I can weld the doubler plate to the web. The doubler plate will be 20'' long.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

I’m confused. Is this a beam or is it a hanger with a tension only load?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
its beam splice. Collector beam

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

Sounds like a tie to me. My definition of a beam is a member primarily loaded in bending.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

I am also confused... if it's block shear that's the problem, why not increase the edge distance of the first row of bolts or increase the number of bolts? If it's a field welded splice, why not increase the length of the weld plate?

If I've misunderstood something, perhaps a sketch of the situation is in order?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

Quote (BAGW)

Adding doubler plate make the web thickness larger thus helping the block shear. Am I missing something here?

I suspect so but it's pretty hard to tell without a sketch. As I see it, the splice plate pulls on the doubler plates which, in turn, pull on the original beam web in block shear, as was originally the case. If that's the case, then the only improvement would come about if, somehow, the perimeter of your doubler plates were somehow substantially larger than the welded perimeter of your splice plates were. And if the doubler plates could be made that large, then I don't see why the splice plates themselves simply couldn't be made that large, obviating the need for the doubler plates altogether.

Quote (BAGW)

Yes, I can weld the doubler plate to the web. The doubler plate will be 20'' long.

What I wanted to know was how far into the existing beam you could potentially take the splice plate. Like winelandv, I don't understand why you cant extend the splice plate until the welded or bolted perimeter is sufficient for block shear.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
I am attaching the sketch.

Cannot achieve the block shear capacity by extending the splice plate with additional bolts. The plate becomes too large. I can access upto 24'' inches plus or minus.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

Thanks for the sketch. Having seen it, I stand by the concern that I voiced in my last post. I think that your block shear perimeter is now just the perimeter of the doubler plate rather than the perimeter of your bolt group. So you've increased capacity a small amount but at a large cost. And your capacity would be no better than it would be if you just made the splice plate welded and the size of the doubler plates, omitting the doubler plates.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

It looks like you're using the welded double plate to engage more web along the length of the beam...but only by about maybe 1 or 2 bolt spacings. So it looks like its a lot of site welding for little benefit. Why not skip the bolted splice and just make the welded double plates continuous across the splice?

Be careful with how close your double plates get to the beam flanges - you'll restrict access and won't be able to weld all around as you're showing.

Is there any reason you can't add plates to the underside of top flange and to the bottom flange as well?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

thx for the sketch. If the load is tension, axial?, then what is "block shear" ?

isn't the problem "merely" making a load transfer into the doubler good for 500,000 lbs ?
and accounting for shear lag (the load from the caps flanges).

however you do this, working within the inside of the beam flanges, and now also with a length limitation, there is a limit on how much load you can ship. If the load required is bigger than the capacity then ... redesign.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
Maybe I can eliminate the doubler plates and use only the splice plate as pointed out. Will also stress on contractor if there is a possibility of adding flange plates.

Going back to what I had been doing, the doubler plate length is selected based on weld requirement. The block shear for the doubler plate itself is not a problem. To just give you an idea, web can handle 70% of the tension force in block shear.

Adding to this, doubler plate thickness was chosen so that the web thickness + doubler plate thickness works for the block shear. The doubler plate alone cannot carry the entire 500kips of the load.



RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

I still feel that there's a fundamental misunderstanding of load path here BAGW. The web doubler does nothing to improve the kip/in block shear capacity of the web. It merely increases the block shear perimeter for the kip/in of the original beam web. This is quite different from the shear capacity improvement that doublers do give you in, say, panel zone reinforcement schemes.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

rb1957,

Shear lag needs to be accounted for, but the block shear failure also needs to be accounted for in tension connections. It's a simultaneous failure of tension rupture at the part perpendicular to the load and shear yielding or rupture at the part parallel to the load. I'm not sure if it's in the AISC LRFD 1st or 2nd editions, but it is in the AISC 13th edition - Section J4.3. I've attached a snip of tension member showing the shear and tension areas.


So in BAGW's situation, it's checking for a 3-sided shape pulling out of the base material.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
@Koootk, why wont the doubler increase the kip/in capacity of the web. Now the doublr plate acts like part of the web as it has weld capacity to transfer all the tension force. If the connection has to break out in block shear, it has to pull out the web and the doubler plate as a system.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

The sandwich that is the web + doublers will all rip out together in block shear. And when they do, that ripping will be around the perimeter of the doubler plates but just outside of the doubler plates. So you'll be ripping through lonely web with no aid from the doubler.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

I believe there are two block shear considerations here. The bolt group would have to pull out the web + doubler plates. The doubler plates plates would have to pull out the web at the welds. Because of your restricted access, the doubler plates are only engaging an extra few inches of web and you're only getting a marginal increase in capacity compared to the bolts engaging just the web (no doubler plates). What is the beam size?

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

Quote (CANPRO)

I believe there are two block shear considerations here. The bolt group would have to pull out the web + doubler plates. The doubler plates plates would have to pull out the web at the welds.

This was especially well articulated so I'm going to piggy back onto it by adding one critical piece. The part of the block shear that went into the beam web in the first check, is still in the beam web for the second check in my opinion. Hence the inefficiency of the concept.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
@ CANPRO and Ktook

I completely agree. Have to check two block shears as CANPRO pointed out. Thanks

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

I see kootk's point. It would be similar if you had a retaining wall that was tied back with a deadman anchor, but your deadman didn't extend past your failure wedge of soil. You're basically trying to anchor into something that is eventually just going to be going along for a ride.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

Quote (BAGW)

I completely agree.

Really? So soon? That's an impressive degree of mental plasticity for a structural engineer. It takes most folks 100+ posts to get past their egos.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

If you are adding a welded doubler plate that takes the full capacity of the connection, why just use that and eliminate the bolts.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

(OP)
@ Ktook

LOL. I was missing the point for the doubler plate shear break out at the beam web. Thats what will control now. The Bolt region is fine with doubler plate.

RE: Doubler Plate design for beam web

see if I've got this right ...

we're welding the doubler to the web, either under the splice plate or on the opposite side, so we have to check "block shear" around the perimeter of the doubler (to verify that the beam is ok).

then we have to check block shear in the splice plate for some %age of the load (some load sheared into the doubler).

of course, we have to check net section (doubler + splice plate) where all to load has left the beam; presumbly the beam net section is already checked.

and we have to check the fasteners (shear and bearing) and the welds.

so it sounds as though the critical failure now (prompting this redesign) is block shear in the beam, (cause the doubler takes some of the beam load away) ... but we don't gain much;
secondary failures could be splice plate area (if beam block shear is ok, then thicker plates would work) or fasteners (bigger bolts could work ?).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources