×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

stent wire / expansion surface contact problems

stent wire / expansion surface contact problems

stent wire / expansion surface contact problems

(OP)
I'm having some difficulty defining contact/interaction between my stent and expansion cylinder (wire stent). I'm not getting what I'm expecting from my results. It is running to completion without errors, but when viewing the results, it looks like my surface is interacting with the actual nodes/elements of the wire rather than the surface of the section. I think this has something to do with an interaction definition, but I don't see how. I think I might see how it's done in Abaqus Explicit with general contact, but I'm using standard and it doesn't appear to be the same.

Any thoughts?

RE: stent wire / expansion surface contact problems

Hi ryan,

I think, at the first photo, your blue part is shell and green part is beam. (Is that true?)

Are you expecting your blue part (which is shell) be interact with your green part's imaginary outer surface (which is beam)?

I don't think it is possible for the beam sections. I suppose that it is only valid for sheel sections to interact even if there is clerence between the surfaces.

Anybody else?

RE: stent wire / expansion surface contact problems

(OP)
Yes, you are correct on shell and beam. You also assumed the correct interaction (blue interact with imaginary outer surface).

Is it just not possible with standard? I have an explicit example which I followed (but changed to standard), which when solved in explicit does have the offset. I do not believe there is anything like an offset defined - just "general contact (explicit)". I had assumed it was in this definition where the interaction with the imaginary surface happened.

Maybe I just have to calculate and take into account the radius of the wire for sizing my expander?

RE: stent wire / expansion surface contact problems

I think there may be something like that;

In the model which you followed, I think there may be a modelling tecnique like that;

1- Analist may have modelled the shell and wire with the clearance between them.
2- The clearence equals the half of the shell thickness. (I suppose that he defined the shell thickness from the middle surface) .
3- Before the analysis, he deactivated "exclude shell element thickness" in the contact properties.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources