×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Filling the gaps between delegated design items

Filling the gaps between delegated design items

Filling the gaps between delegated design items

(OP)
In my office we often specify windows as a delegated design item and have them supported on CFMF walls which are also specified as a delegated design item.

My question for those of you who have similar experience is this; who is responsible for the design of the blocking between the window and the wall? Is it the SSE for the windows, the SSE for the CFMF walls, or the SEOR?

There are arguments for and against each of those options. My instinct is that the SSE for the windows should design it. The way that our specs are written they are already designing the anchorage for the window. We as the SEOR do not want to do it because we don't know for sure what the windows and CFMF are doing until after the submittal process begins. If we start designing blocking at that point it will be a change order for sure. The SSE for the CFMF will almost certainly refuse for similar reasons to us and since timber is not their specialty.

So, what do you think? Is there a standard practice here that I am missing? I've been scouring the codes, MasterSpecs, and industry articles for some guidance but so far have come up short.

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

What do you mean by blocking between the windows and metal framing. Typically around here the window openings are framed tight enough that there is only minor shims required between the window frame and the wall framing. The shimming is typically covered by the window sub.

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

(OP)
Jayrod12,

In the case of a building with a veneer and wall cavity the window will often be set out beyond the CFMF backup and over the wall cavity. To ensure that there is a solid substrate for the window to anchor to we place a piece of blocking (2x6 or 2x8 usually) on top of the CFMF and cantilevering out over the cavity underneath the window frame.

For reference, the way that we handle this situation when the backup material is CMU instead of CFMF is to provide a wide bond beam (10" or 12" wide if the rest of the CMU is 8"). This reduces the cavity width just below the window and provides the solid surface for window anchorage.

I personally don't like the blocking detail which I described in the first paragraph and would prefer to use a steel plate. Alas, I'm told "this is how we've always done it" more often than I would care to say...


I've attached an example of what I am talking about, taken from google images.

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

I get it.

Around here though, the building envelope is provided behind any veneer, therefore the window itself (being part of the building envelope) is provided at that plane, and the sills are manufactured wider to get out to the edge of veneer.

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

That's typical of old detailing. The new energy code for us does not allow that form of thermal bridging to occur. They would get crucified by the plans examiners for trying to put blocking through the insulation.

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

(OP)
I think what they are doing to address the thermal bridge issue is to hold the blocking back slightly and provide a small amount of insulation or FRP between the veneer and the blocking.

What do you see instead of this?

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

Glass line back at the face of the stud/sheathing, insulated sills, and the insulation on the face of the studs run tight to the sills.

RE: Filling the gaps between delegated design items

As an almost former CFMF designer, it seems the GC always ended up with it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources