×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

(OP)
Hi All,

Can anyone please advise me on below query ?

We received raw material (Super Duplex Steel Bars UNS S32760, size: 160mm OD, Heat treatment: Solution Annealed and quenched) and it was found that 19 HRC(216 BHN) in Material Test certificate.
But, when we measured, the actual hardness is found to be 255 BHN which is within the acceptable limits of hardness as required for Super Duplex (270 BHN Max).
When we contacted our principal supplier about the differences which we found in hardness values, they clarified that mill performs hardness at mid wall and that’s why, mill measured hardness value (216 BHN=19HRC)) is lower than surface hardness value (255 BHN) what we measured.
Can we accept this justification ? What is the minimum hardness value for Super Duplex ?
The intended material should have a greater abrasion resistance and it will be used for downhole completion (drilling) application.

Thanks and regards

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

I don't believe there is a minimum hardness spec, so long as it meets yield and UTS. It's up to you to specify a minimum hardness for abrasion resistance.

Nathan Brink

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

When you think about it the min UTS and min yield set the low end, and the min elongation and max hardness set the upper end.
My hunch is that the hardness at mid-radius is being taken on the tensile sample from that location. This is fairly common.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

(OP)
Thanks NBrink & Ed for your input.

Final question, is there any reason behind such drastic hardness variation between surface & mid-wall (from 255 to 216 BHN) ?

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

My guess is that either they were given a light draw pass for size control/surface finish improvement, or it could be from rotary straightening. Either of these would impart some cold work to the outer surface.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

Yeah, processing could account for a variation in hardness, but just to be on the safe side, I'd look into your hardness testing procedure.

I've seen huge variations in hardness between those little handheld hardness testers that a lot of end users and fabricators use. They're very dependent on proper surface prep, calibration, etc. Could be a real variation in hardness, but could absolutely be a measurement error...

Nathan Brink

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

And of course there is the correction to make for testing on a curved surface, deducting a bit from the readings.
And there is no conversion for duplex stainless between hardness scaled, don't try.
We had to build our own.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

(OP)
Thank you all for your valuable feedback.

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

Testing mid radius is a route practice for big bars, that is more representative than that on surface. Any cold working tends to harden surface more, so surface could get a higher strength/hardness. Also, Rockwell scale normally gets you a lower converted HB compared with direct Brinell.

RE: Super Duplex SS Hardness limit (minimum)

(OP)
Thank you all for your answers.

Even, the supplier has also come up with the same explanation that outer surface of our raw material: hollow cylindrical bar (6" OD x 4" ID)was subject to skim machining/cold working which induced a slight increase in surface hardness. Again, other pieces are also tested using Rockwell testing unit (HRC scale)and results are as follow:

Hardness as per mill MTC: 21 HRC (material condition: 25Cr Super Duplex; solution annealed & quenched

Measured surface hardness after surface machining at fabrication workshop: 23 HRC



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources