×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bundled Bars

Bundled Bars

Bundled Bars

(OP)
Hi,

I'm reviewing drawings prepared by another engineer and he has 6" wide beams with two 2 -3/4 inch bars top and bottom. Because the structure is close to the sea, the concrete cover is 1.5" which doesn't leave any space between the bars. I raised this with the design engineer and he indicated that the two bars are bundled bars so he need not satisfy the spacing requirements of ACI Cl7.6.

I've never seen a 6" wide beam before much less two bundled bars in the bottom and two in the top with a ties around them. Any thoughts or comments?

Thanks

RE: Bundled Bars

I guess it works okay, but I don't think he is saving any money using such a narrow web. I would prefer 8" minimum.

BA

RE: Bundled Bars

I've done something similar with 8" grade beams before. The bundling doesn't bother me if no splicing is required. The two issues that I foresee:

1) I've never been sure how to interpret end anchorage requirements in this situation. I guess you could develop for the force required but, if you're going with "terminate with hook past support center-line", it's tough to know if that still applies with bundled hooks. Not even sure that there's such a thing as a bundled hook. I suspect not.

2) There's always a danger that this will lead to a severly over-reinforced beam. I guess that's not technically possible if the compression steel matches the tension but still...

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Bundled Bars

Bad idea for a structure close to the sea...

Dik

RE: Bundled Bars

I wouldn't call a 6" wide concrete member a beam. More like a joist. I would either widen it, or if that width is really all that is required, would use a single larger bar.

RE: Bundled Bars

(OP)
Is there a requirement for the length of the top and bottom part of the ties for anchorage?

For a joist we would typically detail a 180 degree hook. For a 6” wide beam with 1.5” cover the length of the standard hook will be less than 3”. The tie size is 3/8”.

RE: Bundled Bars

Yeah, that's the other trick. Can you even get neaningful ties in there? S-shaped single legs might be more sensible. I would hope that something proportioned like this wouldn't be working too hard in shear. I agreee with dik's concerns regarding durability in a coastal environment. Sounds like it's not your baby anyhow though.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Bundled Bars

In a perfect world, a #3 tie would work with a "J" distance of 3". However, once you take off the tie diameter, you are only left with 2-1/4" in between and the 3/4" diameter bars can't be in the same horizontal plane. In this case, whether you use a 180 degree hook or a tie, the "J" value would still be 3".

What is this beam holding up? Is this just some sort of turned down edge (header) to connect the top of a window or door?

Would agree that you might be better off with a single bar or bars in parallel layer (even if you want to use bundled bars, provide them one on top of the other rather than one besides the other in a horizontal plane)

Commentary R7.7.6 recommends a cover of 2" for walls and slabs and 2.5" for other members. Not sure how many engineers follow this recommendation, but this is just FYI.

If you don't get proper consolidation and rock pockets in this congested beam, you are going to have big problems with spalling etc. in future.

RE: Bundled Bars

I've used single leg stirrups, alternate them... worked well. Added: Still a bad idea to use 6" width...

That may be a bit of a solution using one or two bars stacked/bundled vertically with single leg ties; this could maximise the concrete cover.


Dik

RE: Bundled Bars

Why would you want to do it? 8" minimum and use proper ties.

RE: Bundled Bars

Are the bundled bars stacked vertically, or placed side-by-side? It would seem that if in the side-by-side condition, you would risk segregation or honeycombing under the bars in such a narrow joist.
Dave

Thaidavid

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources