×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pile Driving Formula?

Pile Driving Formula?

Pile Driving Formula?

(OP)
I have a project that requires the use of some very lightly loaded wood piles. I have done a project like this in a long time and there used to be a code reference that allowed for the calculation of the allowable pile capacity based upon a driving formula. The formula was written as follows:

R=2E/(s+c)

I went into the code and this formula is no longer listed. In place of this formula the code says that the pile capacity can be obtained by an approved driving formula. The local jurisdiction further places a FOS on this formula as 3.5. Now I am tasked with trying to figure out the original FOS of the formula (which I would like to use). Does anyone recognize this formula and what the FOS would be for the formula?

I believe the formula is called the EN formula and was developed by Wellington and was originally written as Qu=WH/(s+c). Further research suggests a FOS of 6 be applied to this formula. I guess the 2 located in the formula is throwing me for a bit of a loop.

RE: Pile Driving Formula?

(OP)
I might have figured it out.....

E = W*h which is expressed in ft-lbs
s is in inches

So the 2 is coming from the unit conversion / FOS

Does this seem correct?

RE: Pile Driving Formula?

It does look like the old ENR formula.....which was: Pa= W*h/F(s+c).

You have just substituted "E" for W*h (ram hammer weight times the height the hammer falls).

If you will note there is an "F" in that formula.....that is your factor of safety. As you noted: they recommended a FS of 6 using it. (I think the "modified" ENR formula is much more widely used now. It also uses a FS of 6.)

I'd ask your geotech for some input as to which formula to use (and FS). If they do a lot of work in the area.....they've seen real results.

RE: Pile Driving Formula?

SteelPE, Japanese guidelines give the 2 shown in the dynamic formula for hydraulic hammers only. Appears that this is because hydraulic hammers are accelerated to 2g.

I assumed that the pile driving formulas perhaps are "normalized" to hydraulic hammers, therefore all the formulas have the 2 factor.

Then, there are "allowable" driving formulas which vary the factor "c" (from Prakash's pile foundation book: "c" is the additional penetration of the pile that would have occurred if energy losses during pile driving were zero). See attached extracts from the NAVFAC DM 7.2 manual for some allowable driving formulas.

Because these are "allowable" formulas, a FOS is included (which I assume it is built into the determination of the factor "c"). But, the general understanding is that the FOS is about 6 as you and WARose have indicated.

Anyways, I know that you already know this, but generally, these equations just serve as a guide to have an idea of the preliminary pile allowable capacities. Therefore, perhaps actual codes may be enforcing the use other methods to estimate pile capacites and that may be the reason you cold not find that equation in your current code.

RE: Pile Driving Formula?

SteelPE, perhaps this is too late but I was trying to clean my PC during the holidays and found this old document from Wellington:

https://vulcanhammerinfo.files.wordpress.com/2017/...

It just explains that based on experience the safe load is 1/6 of the ultimate load. See page 10 of the document.

I got this paper from the vulcanhammer website (https://vulcanhammer.net/). This website has lots of good stuff about pile driving...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources