×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

On load tapchangers - US v Others

On load tapchangers - US v Others

On load tapchangers - US v Others

(OP)
The US tends to use reactors in their tap changer diverter configurations, whereas a large part of the rest of the world uses switched resistors. As a non-US electrician, what are the benefits and drawbacks of using reactors, and is this as a result of the common US practice to tap on the low voltage side of the transformer, against the neutral end of the high voltage side in other parts of the world. What is the typical maintenance program for the reactor version?

RE: On load tapchangers - US v Others

The reason to go with the reactor based system is to eliminate the "change in current with respect to time (di/dt)". The resistor type is usually used to "clanp" the voltage to a definite E/R ratio. I would offer that some of these devices also use a thristor based system, typically on large inductive loads such as induction furnaces.

RE: On load tapchangers - US v Others

I'm in the US, and only spec high speed resistive or vacuum diverter LTCs. Maintenance is the issue. Get rid of or reduce arcing, and maintenance intervals go way up. Reactive LTCs require frequent oil filtering and contact replacement.

RE: On load tapchangers - US v Others

I found a good explanation for the different approach in the US and elsewhere in the following book:

Laughton, M.A.; Warne, D.F.: "Electrical Engineer's Reference Book", 16th edition, Oxford, 2003

US engineers tend to specify a large number of taps with small tap steps. With the inductor approach the bridging position can be used as running tap.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources