The Australian concrete standards (AS3600 and AS5100.5) both have a clause which allows development lengths to be be reduced if more steel than required is provided. Doing this at a potential hinge forming region can result in sudden non-ductile collapse when overloaded since bond failure instead of gradual ductile collapse from yielding of rebars. AASHTO LFRD has a similar clause but advise to use only if yield not required. I think the Australian clause should do the same to prevent indiscriminate use of this clause. I believe all concrete structures should be detailed to fail in a ductile manner to give warning of impending collapse when overloaded. Please share your views on this.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Since the later 1980s, manufacturing companies have seen over 3 percent in labor output year on year, with most of this productivty enhancement occuring because of the optimization of repetitive tasks. Download Now