×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

face seal vs. lip seal

face seal vs. lip seal

face seal vs. lip seal

(OP)
Does anyone have an opinion about whether a face seal or a lip seal is better for a centrifugal pump?

RE: face seal vs. lip seal

     Mechanical face seals in my opinion are better in most applications.  As always it depends upon the application.  Lip seals leak more, the elastomers can age faster, and in the case of a catastrophic failure cannot control leakage as well as a mechanical seal.  Lip seals, however; are cheaper, and easier to install.  

     Mechanical seals can be engineered for many more applications than lip seals can.  Higher temperatures, more corrosive fluids, and higher pressures can be sealed with mechanical seals than lip seals.  


     Josh

RE: face seal vs. lip seal

We have been aplying face seals for bearing protection and the results are excelent! They have a lower wear rate, and protect the bearing against contaminants.

RE: face seal vs. lip seal

tope

For what its worth I understand your question and reasoning.  I believe in most cases a face seal is better, however I think Longeron is correct, seals for the most part are determined by the application.  The real problem with the original design is a manufacture of a piece of equipment wants the lowest standard cost available.  This could increase the gross margin or lower the sales price for the manufacture.  On the other side of the desk an end user wants the highest quality or least amount of problems with the operation.  This only leaves two questions:

1)    Manufacture:
How do you convince a purchasing agent the higher initial cost will benefit him in the long term?

2)    End User:
How do you convince the manufacture to incorporate two designs in their product (increase standard cost) so you can use quality when the rest of the manufacturing world only considers initial cost?

I guess these two questions are relative to anything.

RE: face seal vs. lip seal

D23:

     The answer to your first question is generally that you can't.  There is no real reason for the pump OEM to give the end user a higher quality pump seal.  It is another point where cost savings can be achieved.  Most pump OEMs are not in the seal business.  They pretend to be sometimes.  However, if the pump OEM is also a seal OEM, things can be turned around.  The obvious example should be Flowserve.  If the end user doesn't specify another make of seal, Durco, IDP, Pacific, and the rest of the conglomeration should spec out the best Dura, Five-Star, or BW/IP seal they can.  Then all they have to do is pass on the end user info to the local seal rep and they have all the repair or upgrade business.  

(I just hope some higher up in Flowserve doesn't read that)

     As for part two; the seal, pump, and bearing reps should be making it a point to say to the end users that the best thing they can do to improve the mean time between repair and decrease maintenance costs is to spec themselves the best parts for the application, or have the respective parts rep spec out the best parts.  Why would the bearing rep have anything to gain by suggesting the worst bearing for an application?  He wouldn't.  Who would buy from him again?  

RE: face seal vs. lip seal

longeron

I couldn’t possibly disagree with anything you say.  I don’t work for Flowserve

The problem I face everyday is dealing with purchasing agents whose bonus plan is based on the amount of money they save. This bonus is typically based solely on initial cost of equipment.  As bad as this may be it actually seems to be the current operating mentality for most of the industrial world.  

I finished a short school about two months ago named “Value Pricing.”  As a manufacture I have a seemingly unlimited amount of information that I can provide a customer during the operational life of their equipment.  This information can change a catastrophic failure and replacement into nothing more than a scheduled repair.  For an end user this becomes a question of the value of information.  The problem I have is information cost money.  If brand-X has a lower cost they get the sale!

It would be great to find a way to get manufactures, purchasing agents and operations all on the same page.

Oh well this has nothing to do with seals!

RE: face seal vs. lip seal

It's a stray from seals, but interesting. There is an equalizer, it's in the form of warranty, and a suppliers ability to stand behind it. There are many reasons why a purchaser may want to reduce his investment. An astute purchaser will shop and compare, and draw conclusion from thier experiences. Suppliers that have high pripriotory concepts may be imune from competition, but those in comodities will be price driven. How do you convince purchasers of value, sell them in service, typically in the form of warranty. Then live up to the claim.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources