×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

(OP)
I have a steel moment frame (beam welded to columns)as shown below.
I have designed this frame as fixed at supports. Then I have desing connection (base plate + anchors) between RC foundation and column.

If I consider my support reactions while Im designing/calculating foundation I get an enormous dimensions since a moment at the base of column (fixed support) is pretty big.
But if i make a 3d model in FEM software I get much smaller foundation (600 x 600 mm with depth of 900 mm) because I think it takes into account that foundations will rotate a bit (I have modeled soil as springs under foundation. I checked forces/moments in columns and it looks like the software calculated them as the supports were PINNED). In reality does that mean, that there will be some rotation of foundation which means I could consider my supports as pinned not fixed? Which model should I use since I get so much different results in terms of foundation dimensions?









RE: transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

Quote:

But if i make a 3d model in FEM software I get much smaller foundation (600 x 600 mm with depth of 900 mm) because I think it takes into account that foundations will rotate a bit (I have modeled soil as springs under foundation. I checked forces/moments in columns and it looks like the software calculated them as the supports were PINNED). In reality does that mean, that there will be some rotation of foundation which means I could consider my supports as pinned not fixed? Which model should I use since I get so much different results in terms of foundation dimensions?

I think it would depend on how much confidence you have in the spring constants you are using. You being a geotech are in a unique position to evaluate that. If you are using ultra conservative constants (i.e. it can't be any less flexible than that)....then you might be able to justify it.

That being said, I'm not sure if I have ever used a flexible footing foundation model to justify cutting the moments down. In such a case (depending on the soil type) I'll model it both ways and run with the worse for each part.

You might be able to take the guess work out of it by making the base a pinned detail.

RE: transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

It's usually something of a judgement call. Either you make an attempt to model the true flexibility of the base assembly or you make some assumptions and run with it. I might do something like this:

- Design the superstructure as though the bases were pinned.

- Design the base plate structure for 50% of the moment that would occur assuming full fixity.

- Design the footings assuming pinned bases but throw in some top steel to the tune of 1/3 the bottom steel.

This is not an entirely conservative approach of course.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

I got a lot of questions about this too - what happens if foundation has insufficient dimensions? Does that mean the part of foundation under compression moves - settles too much and foundation rotate? in this case, doesnt foundation press against soil (vertically)?
since foundation rotates, has that the same effect on steel frame as pinned supports?

RE: transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

A lot of people just say they're pinned and use a thin flexible baseplate.

RE: transfering moment from a steel column to a single foundation?

Quote:

I have modeled soil as springs under foundation

Did you model these as two way springs or compression only? Remember the "connection" between footing and soil cannot transfer tension.

If you can, I would simplify the whole thing and design the frame with pinned bases.
Design your footings and base plates for the axial loads only. If you want to be somewhat conservative, design for some arbitrary moment in those footings.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources