×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

(OP)
The piping wall thinning is caused by microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in high pressure service water system in nuclear power plant. The pipe was designed in accordance with ASME B31.1. Is ASME B31G applicable to do the evaluation to assess the strength of remaining pipe wall thickness? As ASME B31.1 appendix IV-1 indicates the B31G may provide additional guidance.

Your time and help would be appreciated.

RE: pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

Your are dealing with pits which typically will not be large enough to effect the structural integrity of the pipe. Suggest that you hydrostatically test the piping. Add a disinfectant.

RE: pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

This is a problem that has been around for decades in the US Nuclear Power industry. I worked on this issue in 1993

In the USA, detailed methodologies for pitting detection and preferred mitigation techniques were well developed by EPRI and the USNRC

http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionS...

1. USNRC Generic Letter 89-13, Service Water Problems Affecting Safety-Related Equipment; July 18, 1989.

2. EPRI TR-102063, Guideline for the Examination of Service Water Piping
3. EPRI TR-109633, Guideline for the Evaluation and Treatment of Corrosion and Fouling in Fire Protection Systems


The issue of MIC induced corrosion was folded into USNRC concerns about "flow induced corrosion" which had been discovered just a couple of years before the Service/Raw water MIC issues became of note. There was a pipe rupture failure in an elbow in the feedwater system at the Surry Nuclear Power Station about 1989.

Several plants simply decided to replace decades old carbon steel systems with high-nickel materials resistant to MIC.

https://www.rolledalloys.com/shared/library/techni...

Consulting firms developed training programs and technical papers (and careers ?)on this specific subject

https://www.structint.com/competency/training/trai...

So, I don't think an informal pitting evaluation and a quick hydro test will cut the mustard ....

In what country is this Nuclear Plant located and why is MIC pitting now a new issue ?



MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

RE: pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

(OP)
Thank you very much for great help and time.

RE: pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

MJCronin,
Great post, thank you.

MIC was already on the radar in Navy Nuclear Power in 1972 when I went through Nuc School in Vallejo. I don't think I've ever read anything better on the subject than was available (mostly in confidential documents) in 1974 when we refueled in Bremerton.

I don't think the world's understanding of this issue has improved since the 1960s, but the proposed "solutions" seem to keep getting dumber. I have cut into pipelines for repairs several times and had to deal with concentrated biocides falling into welder's laps, the solution to MIC failures is often just dumping in more biocides. That solution has occasionally worked on liquid-filled lines, but two phase and mostly gas lines rarely have the flow energy to transport the chemicals to the colonies.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual. Galileo Galilei, Italian Physicist

RE: pipe wall thinning due to microbiologically influenced corrosion

It might not be completely applicable to nuclear industry SS pipes, but the condenser industry also had to deal with MIC , and resulted in general guidelines related to allowable flow velocity ranges . For SS piping, a flow velocity range of 7-12 fps was sufficient to prevent microbiological attachment, and extended outages with null velocity were to be addressed by draining the condenser. This is the opposite of copper alloy tubedc condensers, which require a max velocity less than 7 fps to avoid erosion corrosion at the tube entrances ( vena contracta effect).

"...when logic, and proportion, have fallen, sloppy dead..." Grace Slick

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources