×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ENTHALPY DIFFERENCE -VS- SPECIFIC HEAT : SIZING OF HEAT EXCHANGER

ENTHALPY DIFFERENCE -VS- SPECIFIC HEAT : SIZING OF HEAT EXCHANGER

ENTHALPY DIFFERENCE -VS- SPECIFIC HEAT : SIZING OF HEAT EXCHANGER

(OP)
Hi,

As title referred, I understand that for a single phase (sensible heat) it is preferred that specific heat method is used to determined the duty. However, when the flow is a slug flow I found that even a minor fraction of vapor would effect the calculated duty when using specific heat method. In that case, I'll turn to enthalpy difference to calculate the duty.

My question is this, I knew that software like HTRI would use enthalpy difference method when calculating for duty if pre-installed media is used, in fact for a single phase (sensible heat), the enthalpy difference method could be used as well. So which one is better to determine the duty regardless of the type of flow and phase it is?

Thanks!

RE: ENTHALPY DIFFERENCE -VS- SPECIFIC HEAT : SIZING OF HEAT EXCHANGER

Do you get different answers?

I personally use enthalpy difference as I can pull specific enthalpies for pure components from REFPROP.

RE: ENTHALPY DIFFERENCE -VS- SPECIFIC HEAT : SIZING OF HEAT EXCHANGER

(OP)
Difference by few hundreds despite requiring to design 10& - 15% slightly higher.

Let say using enthalpy method I got around 2350 kW and using specific heat method I got around 2100 kW.

On top of that, my supplier sizing software does not have features where you can design using enthalpy method so it's quite difficult to design for application with slug flow even sometimes when the amount of vapor is low, we simply ignore and design it as full liquid form (zero (0) vapor fraction), it works but less accurate.

RE: ENTHALPY DIFFERENCE -VS- SPECIFIC HEAT : SIZING OF HEAT EXCHANGER

Dear Taki,

Specific heat and enthalpy are the same thing, an Calorific energy balance. Please refer to definition of specific heat (at constant pressure) = variation of Enthalpy with respect to temperature when pressure is held constant. Being Enthalpy a state function, the actual path (pressure remaining constant) does not matter when calculating Enthalpy variations of a pure substance between two points.

Cp (T2 - T1) = H2 - H1

No difference at all.

The possible outcome differences may arise from unexact estimates/assumptions: for instance, assuming specific heat remains constant over the temperature range.

If Enthalpies are experimental, use enthalpies.

BR;
Roberto

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources