INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

(OP)
Hello Guys, i have a question regarding the weld beatween a pipe carbon steel cladded with uns 6625 wall thk 28mm. The consumable required is UNS 6625 . My client required pwht according to B. 31.3 but i would not to do pwht because the uns 6625 not required this procedure. The weld literature do not recomanded the pwht for joint welded with UNS 6625. I have proposed to increase the preheat permitted by ASME VIII but i'am not sure that to will be approved. Do you have some suggestion? Do you know if there are Asme interpretation?

Thanks Marcello

RE: Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

Normally this weld would be made with both 625 filler and steel filler.
If you doing it with all 625 then you may need to put a butter pass on the parts, then PWHT, then weld the joint in 625.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

PWHT would be required if the base material thickness requires it by Code. In this case, you apply a butter layer using Inco 82 or 182 electrode, perform PWHT and complete the weld joint using 625.

RE: Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

You may try to apply the clauses of Table 331.1.3: Exemptions to Mandatory Postweld Heat Treatment, after discussion with your client, provided PWHT is not deemed mandatory as per project specifications. Note-4 of this table explains mandatory PWHT requirements.
The immediate concern after PWHT could be the failure of bend test due to Carbide precipitation & reduced ductility. You may refer this document for overall guidance.
E-ER-NiCrMo3 is usually the consumable of choice, however stringency over and above ASME Sec II, Pt-C may be required.

Thanks.

http://www.nipera.org/~/Media/Files/TechnicalLiter...

Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.IWE
Welding & Metallurgical Specialist
Ontario,Canada.
ca.linkedin.com/pub/pradip-goswami/5/985/299

RE: Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

If you are working with B31.3 don't pull in ASME VIII and complicate matters. If your client is not also specifying a corrosion test to qualify the welding procedure, an increased preheat/interpass temperature may be tolerable, but try to ascertain why a PWHT is being mandated. Since the material is clad, PWHT for internal service exposure shouldn't be a consideration; is this a subsea external hydrogen embrittlement issue? If the client remains adamant, keep the temperature below 590 deg C and use the shortest soak time possible.

Steve Jones
Corrosion Management Consultant

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04

All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.

RE: Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

Per B31.3 PWHT is not required on P No.1 material provided a 200 F min preheat is performed/maintained for T > or = to 1". It is quite possible that your client's specs are out of date in this matter.

RE: Joined carbon steel clad with UNS 6625

(OP)
Hi Sjones,
i am agree with you and @pradipgoswami.I must be in compliance with ASME Code + B31.3 e for this kind of wall thk (28mm) the pwht is mandatory( except for Table 331.1.3), the pwht is not required for the type of process. Anyway my client ask me to do PWHT AT 621°C minimun for 2h and qualify a PQR whith ASTM G48 Pr.A, PMI, Ferrite Test. I have already proposed your opinion but my client writes me that delete the pwht only if i show that Carbon Steel joined with UNS6625 without pwht is permitted in ASME or B31.3 or other official code. I have tried to demostrate it with old pqrs qualified without pwht with good result but is not enought. I think will be very difficult to obtain something. Anyway thank you for your opinion.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close