×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

(OP)
I have a situation where due to existing structure I need to install bell piers a few feet away from a new load bearing CMU wall. I plan to design a cantilevered structural slab to pick up the load bearing wall and continue the structural slab back past the grade beam until the slab on grade/structural slab interface can withstand the resultant shear. I wanted to confirm my checks were adequate:

1. checking shear/moment strength of cantilever structural slab at grade beam
2. checking deflection at load bearing wall and back span deflection beyond the grade beam
3. checking shear at structural slab/slab-on-grade interface

Any other concerns I should look out for? See preliminary detail below:

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Make sure the primary span (at the other side of the cantilever) has enough dead load to resist the load of the wall. I don't think your 3' length of thickened slab will cut it. I would extend that at least 10' prior to transitioning to the thinner slab on grade, based on gut feel alone. You obviously need to do the math.

Also, the foundation piers will see much more load from this condition than a simple tributary area condition.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

But the downward stress (moment really) from the load-bearing wall on the left side of the vertical is an upward moment at the 5 inch thick slab as well. Is that not now the point of failure, since a 10 inch slab required to resist moment across the vertical?

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

I'll chime in with the answer to the question you didn't ask: I think you should consider using a grade beam parallel to the existing bldg. to carry the wall, using another grade beam to cantilever over the pier in the perpendicular direction, and allowing the slab to rest entirely on grade.

To me, this makes the system more rational and doesn't dictate the sequence of construction. The slab can then be placed after the roof is on and have control joints, etc. that are more typical slabs.

Maybe there's a reason you already ruled this out, but that's my first thought when I see your section.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

(OP)
kipfoot, I actually was just discussing that scenario with my supervisor and it seems to make to most sense as well. Trying to balance the load is making the back span of structural slab too long in that it's beginning to interfere with other structural elements that can't be moved. I also didn't think about sequencing yet, good point.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Cantilevered beams are probably the best solution but another possibility is to use a grade beam under the bearing wall supported by offset piles placed as close to the existing building as possible.

BA

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

I agree with Kipfoot, keep the load to piles defined and rational. I would only ever do the cantilevered slab if pouring a beam meant undermining the adjacent structure.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Both atrizzy and kipfoot have given good advice. If you use the grade beams as kipfoot suggested, you will need another line of piers to resist the uplift on the cantilevered grade beams.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Hokie makes a good point, ideally though you'd have a set of piers at a reasonable distance back anyway.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Here's what I would do:

Just place an offset pile cap on the pier and resolve the forces in tension and compression in the rebar.
Run a grade beam between these at the CL of the CMU wall above.
Your slab on grade is now just a typical slab on grade.

All this depends on how reasonable your loads are and if you can resolve the moment into that pier via tension and compression in the rebar.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

I agree that offset piles can be a good solution but the eccentricity of load puts a tensile force on the slab or a compressive force on the existing foundation or both. The most economical solution depends on the plan layout of the new structure and the magnitude of load on the bearing wall.

BA

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

If the piles are drilled piers on the scale of what OP's shown, the eccentricity may also be able to be resisted as bending moments in the pile and a resisting soil force couple/set. I see that a arrangement a fair bit on institutional buildings with steel columns coming down on the piles, inboard of the wall system.

Any chance that block wall is a fire wall that needs to remain standing if the new building burns down?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

(OP)

Quote (DETstru)

Just place an offset pile cap on the pier and resolve the forces in tension and compression in the rebar

This would be the most ideal and what I tried initially after posting here. The deep beam design is no problem, but I'm not sure I know a valid way to design a bell pier for moment at grade. Is it as simple as getting lateral resistance values from the geotech and turning the moment into couple forces?

Quote (KootK)

Any chance that block wall is a fire wall that needs to remain standing if the new building burns down?

At the moment, the designers are trying to determine if this should be a fire wall or just fireproof the corridor bay adjacent to this wall. Any particulars I need to look out for if this is a fire wall?

I've revised the detail to the below as it provides the simplest construction so far:

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

I can't tell from the scale of the sketches if you've already considered this, but I'd determine the grade beam depth and top of pier elevations such that the excavation does not undermine the existing grade beams. i.e. bottom of grade beam under the wall = match existing.

It complicates the rebar detailing a bit, but the bottom of the cantilevered portion of the beam shown in section could slope up toward the existing wall, if necessary.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Quote (OP)

Is it as simple as getting lateral resistance values from the geotech and turning the moment into couple forces?

That's about how I do it. As BA suggested, it may be attractive to utilize your slab in tension for part of that couple. Unless you isolate things, that's probably where the tension will want to go anyhow.

Quote (OP)

Any particulars I need to look out for if this is a fire wall?

This situation has caused me all kinds of grief when the wall needs to be able to free-stand after the new building collapses.

- high flexural demand on the wall acting as a cantilever. Often need a thicker wall or intermittent piers with horizontally spanning wall.

- the cantilevered block walls tax the grade beams pretty hard in torsion and everything else down the line in other respects. Particularly so if you're being conscientious and actually trying to calc out the rebar detailing in the joints properly (as opposed to just developing bars). In this one respect, your original solution may have some advantage. Relatively easy to dump the wall moment in slab uniformly. Easy... just not cheap. One could employ a hybrid solution where you use the grade beams for gravity but the slab for moment.

- In addition to resisting modest wind load as a cantilever wall, sometimes you need to design for a "pull down" breakaway load acting the wall as the adjacent framing pulls away per NFPA. Makes a tough thing even tougher.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

(OP)
Kootk, all good points. To go a bit off topic though...Main issue I saw with that is designing the "melt away" or slip connection for the steel joist at top of wall to provide a valid separation between wall and structure. Contacted Vulcraft, but they had no connections that were approved. Poked around the internet, but nothing viable as of yet. Difficult part is designing that connection for both diaphragm and uplift forces, but hopefully it doesn't go down that path.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Another trick is that, in my opinion at least, it's wholly irrational to expect the fire to be located right below the thing that you're counting on melting away. Realistically, it's far more likely that the fire will be melting your framing a bay or two over and when that comes down, it'll be tugging on the wall, with the melt away connection completely in tact.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

For steel joist to fire wall connections we've typically provided a bearing angle where the joists are welded only to the outer toe. Then when the structure tries to fall away it hinges at the weld and breaks away. Luckily so far we haven't had to see if the detail works as designed.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Clever but, again, that only works if it's the joists supported on the angle that melt and fail. If it's the bay over, it's useless.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

The best detail for a firewall is a double wall where each wall is firmly tied each side. It's like two separate buildings.

If a single wall is used, as it usually is, the best detail in my opinion, is to tie it securely from both sides and ensure that the structure on each side is capable of resisting the horizontal force on the opposite side if it should collapse in a fire. I agree with KootK that the fusible link or "melt away" connection cannot be counted on for reasons he stated.

BA

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

I agree, however if it is a bay over, the wall is likely robust enough to hold up the bay that didn't burn down. Besides a dual wall system like BA indicated, there's not really a great proven solution.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Quote (jayrod)

I agree, however if it is a bay over, the wall is likely robust enough to hold up the bay that didn't burn down.

That's the misconception. Holding it up vertically isn't the issue. It's holding it up laterally.

Quote (jayrod)

Besides a dual wall system like BA indicated, there's not really a great proven solution.

Double wall is the Cadillac if the team can be brought around to that way of thinking. Two other good approaches:

1) Design for a rationally estimated lateral load on the cantilevered wall. NFPA has guidance.
2) Have the fire rating for the structure supporting the wall be the same as the wall. This is often overlooked and, for concrete systems, is often quite doable.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

I meant laterally, but I know where you're coming from.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Really? In my experience, there's hardly a wall out there that could resist this kind of loading without having been specifically designed for it.


I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

That's where the difference lies I think, I've always designed the firewalls to be legitimately free standing, I. E. If both sides burned down you'd be left with a 30 ft tall free standing wall. So it has plenty of out of plane capacity.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

(OP)
I think what Kootk is hitting on is many engineers may design for free standing, but are they also designing for the weight of the joist/beam system that did not burn and is still tugging on the wall like a broken tree branch on a tree trunk

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

Precisely. Most folks in my area design for a reduced wind load and call that free standing. Given the BS nature of most breakaway connections, it should be that wind load plus the monstrous lateral "tug" at the top. I've been pulling the values for that from here: Link. And they are substantial.

It's one of those crappy situations where we've inadvertently created a race to the bottom of our own accord in an effort to try to create solutions cheaper than our competitors. My province recently went on a school building binge. Something like 22 new ones in a span of a few years. Owing to a unique bidding process, and my role in that, I had access to most of the designs. Every last one is single wall with some manner of utterly useless breakaway clip. Poor bloody children. One day, one of these things will be put to the test for real. The outcome of that will be great sadness, shame, and hopefully more fire walls that are doubled or connected to both structures as BA mentioned.

It must be sooo frustrating for the code folks. They move heaven and earth to make this stuff as prescriptive as possible so designers can't stick their heads in the sand and punt on account of saving project $$$. Then they leave this one part -- the connection -- up to our discretion and we screw it up. It's embarrassing really.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

It is evidently an issue which requires more serious thought than it has received in the past.

BA

RE: Cantilevered Concrete Slab Supporting Load Bearing Wall

In school fires, students suffer because they lose their classroom, books, and materials. Firefighters are the people most at risk.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources