INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Linear perturbation modal analysis

Linear perturbation modal analysis

(OP)
Hello,

I'm trying to perform modal analysis of laminated thick beam-like structure (SOLID186 2 or 3 elements per layer height, 7 layers) with aid of linear perturbation. Problem is, I'm not exactly sure whether I understand Ansys manual correctly. I'm trying to include prestress by applying temperature (tunif) in static analysis, which will cause stress due to mismatch of thermal expansion coefficients.

!---------------------------------------------------
! Analysis settings:
! Static analysis: simply supported beam, temperature, small deformations...
! Perturbation:
antype,static,restart,,,perturb
perturb,modal,nokeep ! free-free bc
solve,elform
antype,modal,....
...
solve
finish

/post1...
!---------------------------------------------------

Due to theory (zero total external force), there should be almost none change in natural frequency of let's say 1st (bending) and second (bending perpendicular to 1st) modes, (change between prestressed and non-prestressed modal analysis). Which is what I also get from Ansys results. Manual states:

„Thermal loads from the base analysis are ignored in a linear perturbation modal or full harmonic analysis. In addition, you cannot apply thermal loads in the second phase of a linear perturbation modal or full harmonic analysis.“

When I try clamped beam (not laminate) and use temperature to increase tensile stress, there is increase in frequency as it should be.

So my understanding is that it ignores thermal loads (in F_perturbed), but it creates tangent stiffness matrix (K_t) with stress from temperature included in both analyses (simply supported + free free and clamped). Is it right? I also get same results by using pstres,on only without perturbation.

Sorry for maybe stupid question, by the way, and delete it if you wish.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close