INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Undrained shear strength

Undrained shear strength

(OP)
Hello there, i was wondering if someone could help me interpreting this triaxial undrained test.

I need to obtain the undrained shear strength (Su) in terms of the effective vertical pressure: Su/Sigma'v.

Also cohesion and friction angle.

Im attaching the spreadsheet with the results. Thanks a lot.

RE: Undrained shear strength

With the drainage turned off, you should have some maximum deviator stress (total stress) that occurred at undrained failure for that level of confinement. To give me drained P' v. q plots doesn't provide the data to obtain Su, unless you want me to do the homework?

Not sure why the lab is not giving the reporting requirements for CU-txc?

f-d

p.s., also if there is back-pressure saturation, you are assuming that the Su/P is informed only by completely saturated soils. That may or may not be the case?

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Undrained shear strength

The shear strength is q/2 at failure. Usually 'failure' is defined either as the peak value or at a specified strain level, though this strictly depends on the application. If there is no peak before 10% then the value of q at 10% is taken and divided by 2 to give su. It really is important to note that what is defined as failure is dependent on the specific application, however; certain analyses, for instance, might consider the peak principal effective stress ratio as failure instead.

You get c' and φ' by fitting a line to the stress paths from those tests. Usually the peak (qmax) or the ultimate values (at the end of the test) are used to fit the line. However, once again, the line fitting may depend on the specific application. Also, for what it's worth, c' and φ' is not a great idealisation, despite its wide application in geotechnical engineering.

RE: Undrained shear strength

You do not get c' and phi' from the P' v. q' graph! There's trig to relate these two drawings!

You do not get Su from the P' v. q' plot. Those are effective stresses and you are looking for undrained strength.

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Undrained shear strength

Ah yes, the φ' angle actually comes from putting the fitted angle into a fairly standard equation (sinφ' = 3M/(6+M) for compression; sinφ' = 3M/(6-M) for extension; M = q/p').

su is half of q at failure. So the three tests would each have an su. But the OP wants a stress ratio, so they'll have to derive the su for each test and normalise it by the vertical effective stress. That will give three results, but the su to use would depend on the stress expected in the ground.

RE: Undrained shear strength

I'm not sure why you've assumed an internal friction angle and a K0 value in your calculations: you have σ'v0 already (the value at the start of the test). Also, you appear to have defined su as the last value, whereas it is more typically to take the peak deviator stress and divide by 2. Are you certain that your definition of 'failure' is appropriate for your design purposes?

If you want su/σ'v0 then you're going to have three different results: one for each test. Determine su (typically qmax/2) and then normalise by your initial effective vertical stress for each test; this will give you one result per test. You can fit a line through the three results if needed, but the angle of this line won't be your internal friction angle; you do not get the friction angle from a plot of su versus σ'v0 (see the fifth post of this thread).

RE: Undrained shear strength

it seems your peak phi is less than your residual phi, which can't be, based on the stress strain drawings.

the graphs do look good though!

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Undrained shear strength

I'm unsure how you've determined your M values - it's very useful to actually plot this information. Also, to confirm, is your apparent cohesion intercept half of the intercept when plotting q?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close