Sheet Piling
Sheet Piling
(OP)
Hello folks,
In a nutshell, owner of the townhouse in new york city wants to enlarge his house vertically and horizontally, meaning going down around 12' in the existing basement plus he wants to extend the basement all the way to the rear (where there is no basement now) what means he would have to excavate roughly 25'-30' down over there which is a lot of course. There are adjacent buildings, he wants to avoid underpinning, ground water table is below expected bottom of excavation. The soil is class 3a sand with silt and gravel. No way to bring any heavy equipment in.
I am thinking about sheet piles that are pushed by a hydraulic jack. We would install two steel beams going from wall to wall (or new steel column to new steel column)and one beam across and attach hydraulic jack to its flange. We would put enough ballast on the top of those beams plus we could use the self weight of the exist. building. Then we would do that in stages pushing 8'-10' long sheet piles next to each other and brace them from wall to wall..then we would excavate 5'-6' so the first pile's tip is still below the dredge line and push another pile next to it..Please see attached sketch of what I would like to do. I think that way we would reduce a friction and make those sheet piles driving easier.. then the question is how to connect those piles together (moment connection) so it can withstand soil pressure and provide watertightness etc.
We would also pre-drill the soil before jacking up operation. I think we would need at least 30-40 tons force to push it it..
It is just my imagination working so please share if you have any thoughts on that issue. It will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Jack
In a nutshell, owner of the townhouse in new york city wants to enlarge his house vertically and horizontally, meaning going down around 12' in the existing basement plus he wants to extend the basement all the way to the rear (where there is no basement now) what means he would have to excavate roughly 25'-30' down over there which is a lot of course. There are adjacent buildings, he wants to avoid underpinning, ground water table is below expected bottom of excavation. The soil is class 3a sand with silt and gravel. No way to bring any heavy equipment in.
I am thinking about sheet piles that are pushed by a hydraulic jack. We would install two steel beams going from wall to wall (or new steel column to new steel column)and one beam across and attach hydraulic jack to its flange. We would put enough ballast on the top of those beams plus we could use the self weight of the exist. building. Then we would do that in stages pushing 8'-10' long sheet piles next to each other and brace them from wall to wall..then we would excavate 5'-6' so the first pile's tip is still below the dredge line and push another pile next to it..Please see attached sketch of what I would like to do. I think that way we would reduce a friction and make those sheet piles driving easier.. then the question is how to connect those piles together (moment connection) so it can withstand soil pressure and provide watertightness etc.
We would also pre-drill the soil before jacking up operation. I think we would need at least 30-40 tons force to push it it..
It is just my imagination working so please share if you have any thoughts on that issue. It will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Jack






RE: Sheet Piling
High risk (many complex steps, with a lot of unknowns).
Serious consequences (make an error...collapse the structure, injuries / fatalities possible).
www.SlideRuleEra.net
www.VacuumTubeEra.net
RE: Sheet Piling
Dik
RE: Sheet Piling
Dik - it's a typical 25x100 lot with adjacent properties..there is a party wall on one side..
RE: Sheet Piling
High surcharge load on the soil. And, it can vary while the work is in progress. As I understand the plan, jacking will (in part), "...use the self weight of the existing building." While jacking is underway, the surcharge is reduced, when the jacks are unloaded, surcharge returns. Along with this goes the unknown of what will happen to this building during jacking - probably not designed for uplift. Also, possible surcharge from adjacent structures.
www.SlideRuleEra.net
www.VacuumTubeEra.net
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
How to calculate the building's weight? Are there plans? Have modifications been made over the years? Are the materials used in the building's construction in "as-new" condition?
(Estimated) to need "at least 30-40 tons force". So, 40+ tons may be needed. How much of the total is ballast? How will ballast be brought in? Maybe, 20 lb. sandbags, by hand - since there is "No way to bring any heavy equipment in." Is there enough room in the workspace for the ballast?
"...ground water table is below expected bottom of excavation." but the sheeting needs to "provide watertightness". I'm not concerned with leakage, it's about unplanned for hydrostatic pressure on the sheeting - either during construction or later.
"...the question is how to connect those piles together (moment connection)..." What is the answer? For sure would not begin the project without a proven answer. Steel sheet piling has been used on large scale since the 19th century. Is there a proven answer, I don't know of one. Doubt the client is interested in having the property being used for a "high risk" research project.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything, just offer some points to think about. I worked as a Development Engineer (as in "Research and Development") for 4 years full time, then 18 more years part time. The right way to approach a problem using a novel approach is to "do your homework" first. In this case, see if you can find anything like this proposal that has been used successfully. Determine or calculate what you can - ground water level, pertinent existing building details, surcharge loads, soil/water pressure at the appropriate depths, etc.
Then use your imagination to make informed concepts of what may work. Follow this up with calculations to see if your imagination is playing tricks on you - it can.
www.SlideRuleEra.net
www.VacuumTubeEra.net
RE: Sheet Piling
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
DETstru - I can't, that's the main problem..
RE: Sheet Piling
Link
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
Sheet piling and secant pile walls will reduce the footprint of the proposed basement. Underpinning probably will not. Precast lagging panels are usually difficult to install, especially if you have tieback anchors and/or a deep excavation.
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
http://www.deepexcavation.com/en/soil-nail-wall
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
CVG, soil nailing should not be used to support buildings that are immediately adjacent to the excavation. The building can collapse as soon as you make the first cut to install the nails. Google Lancaster, PA building collapse.
For a report on this soil nailing job, go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spGrSRRbAhg
http://lancasteronline.com/news/former-empire-tv-b...
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
The panels aren't precast. It's all cast in-place against the ground. Here's another picture of the construction sequence:
Link
Here's another picture of a similar situation with tiebacks:
Link
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
Some cohesion is indeed needed for temporary face stability. This is not applicable in loose sands or high water tables. The soils around here (CDG) mostly allow a 12h stability time frame to place the premanufactured rebar panels and in the situ concrete and formwork.
Heldbaum
It really depends on the panel dimension, which in turn will depend on soil conditions. The micropiles are designed for vertical load only, which arises from the panel weight and the vertical component of the soil anchor prestress (minus some friction of the wall panel with the soil). For example, if the primary and secondary panels are 3m wide, we can place the micropiles at 2.0m cc for primary panels. There won't be any micropiles for the secondary panels as these are supported laterally in the primary ones.
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
Link 1 (look in page 21 and forward)
Link 2
Both primary and secondary panels are fully reinforced. The concept is different from secant piles as it refers only to the construction sequence. Look in page 22 of the reference I provided.
Some design aspects:
- define a proper construction sequence;
- horizontal actions are the same as for a multi-propped or multi-anchored retaining wall, considering Terazghi and Peck envelope diagrams;
- code-compliant reiforcement lap lengths are required between panels and between cap beam and panels;
- the panels must be analyzed for both directions and in every operation during the construction sequence;
- punching shear reinforcement is normally required around the anchor (strut) connection;
- soldier beams (or micropiles) are designed for compression and buckling only in the upper stages;
- soil embedment length of soldier piles (or micropiles) defined considering sufficient geotechnical capacity for vertical loads;
- over thickness of concrete panel must be considered when calculating vertical loads;
- if long-term support is provided by slabs, a proper connection must be designed (post-installed rebar, rebar in wall and unbending for connection to slab, etc).
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
so I am adding two pictures with floor plans and one boring log. It's a masonry building with pocketed wood joists. On the left side we have a party wall that is shared with 3-story building and on the right side there is a 5-story building with independent masonry wall. All buildings, most likely,have cellars at the same level. So the owner would like to deepen the existing cellar of about 10-12'. The basement floor, which is roughly 10 feet above the cellar level, and around 4' below sidewalk, is to be aligned with cellar level which would mean to excavate roughly 22feet (10'existing + 10-12' new). Furthermore, there is going to be 2-story addition to the existing condition. Independent steel structure from the basement level. But we are not EOR on this project, we were hired to design SOE...The ground water was found 30' below the sidewalk level..I guess can have a small bobcat on site or small drilling rig..What more information would you need in order to elaborate this problem more? Thank you.
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
Here's what
can happendid happen yesterday when digging next to and below another house. After partial demolition of one or more row houses, the remaining party wall and its foundation collapsed due to the excavation and lack of lateral wall support.www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
RE: Sheet Piling
Some of the other, above-described, support methods might work fine under the right ground conditions and with qualified and available contractors. I personally do not design structures that might work. Usually, underpinning will have the least effect on reducing the usable area of the basement/cellar, which I often see as the biggest concern with owners and their architects and structural engineers. As long as the water table is below the bottom of your proposed foundations (as you indicated), you will probably find more contractors interested in bidding conventional, concrete pit underpinning and sheeting than the other methods. I would definitely not support the adjacent buildings with soil nailing or with steel sheet piling unless my client insisted and also gave me a strongly written indemnification agreement, and even then, I still might not do the design.
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Sheet Piling
The suggestion I made regarding Munich-type walls was to present a solution that is typical in this area and that performs well in the typical waterless CDG ground conditions, even close to buildings. However, if there isn't an experienced contractor available who dominates the technique and doesn't have enough accumulated experience, this solution should be avoided and underpinning would be the best option.