INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Upgraded suspension bushings-Radial stress or Seeger rings?

Upgraded suspension bushings-Radial stress or Seeger rings?

(OP)
Looking for some opinions on suspension bushings mount best practice. Both press fit(bushing slightly wider than arm bore) and snap rings (bushing and arm bore dead nuts) are used on stock setups. For an aftermarket upgrade, is it better to use one or the other? I see +|- with both, but mechanical isn't my expertise. Thanks for your input.

RE: Upgraded suspension bushings-Radial stress or Seeger rings?

What car and which control arm, and what are you trying to accomplish by changing it?

All the OEM control arm bushings that I see (at a couple of different OEMs, current mass production vehicles) are press fit.

These bushings do not have any sliding surfaces. The pivoting action of the arm is due to controlled shear (twisting deflection) of the bushing material. Nothing slides and therefore nothing needs to be lubricated. It also means that the press fit on the outside of the bushing, and the bolt clamping load on the inside sleeve, are critical design features.

Aftermarket stuff isn't always like that. Often it's designed to have sliding surfaces. That means it's going to need to be lubricated, or it will squeak, and it will eventually wear out.

RE: Upgraded suspension bushings-Radial stress or Seeger rings?

Bushings are a bit more complex than that. The real answer would take pages.

One advantage of a press fit bush is that typically the outer compresses as it is pressed in. That's why you'll often see plastic outers. This places the rubber under compression, which is vital for durability. With metal outers the final manufacturing stage is to crush the outer shell in to provide the same effect.

If you think you'll be changing bushes often (and you might well be with aftermarket parts) then a mechanical retention is probably easier, but that is the sole advantage I can think of.



Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close