×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reduced wood beam depth
2

Reduced wood beam depth

Reduced wood beam depth

(OP)
Hi,

I designed a new 3.5"x11.25" ceiling beam in an existing house spanning almost 20 feet and the beam supports roughly 8 feet of ceiling tributary loads (10 psf of dead and live loads).
Initially, we were going to replace the existing ceiling beam with a new one and it would've been exposed and protrude below the ceiling finish.
Now, the owner wants the bottom of the beam to be flushed with the ceiling. The existing roof rafters are 2x4s and we will have to reduce depth tremendously by the support.
Flexural and shear demands aren't critical but the deflection is. Is reducing the depth by 7.75 inches even possible? Attachment for a quick sketch.

Roof slope is 7:12 if that helps any.

RE: Reduced wood beam depth

I believe the rule of thumb is 0.6h remaining or 7.2". That being said, your reaction is only 800 lbs. Dunno if I would worry about that.
None of this will affect your deflection in any meaningful way.

RE: Reduced wood beam depth

Since you're flushing the beam up, could you go to a 3 ply that's shallower? What does it frame into on the other end?

RE: Reduced wood beam depth

(OP)

Quote (XR250)

I believe the rule of thumb is 0.6h remaining or 7.2". That being said, your reaction is only 800 lbs. Dunno if I would worry about that.
None of this will affect your deflection in any meaningful way.
The rule of thumb helps. I've mostly allowed ripping 2"~3" before, but not to this magnitude. Low reaction and minimal shear demand are why I'm even trying to determine if it's viable at all.

Quote (jayrod12)

Since you're flushing the beam up, could you go to a 3 ply that's shallower? What does it frame into on the other end?
Shallower ply is doable. The beam sits on a post at the other end and is located in the middle of the building, so the depth is not a concern on the other end.

RE: Reduced wood beam depth

Since the rafters are only 2x4's, you could look into installing plywood gussets on each side of the joint where the rafter intersects your new beam (using blocking if needed to match member thicknesses). Create a truss of sorts and use the gussets to create a large heel. If the notch in your new beam is ok for shear and flexure, it will have negligible impact on deflection since it is so close to the support. That said, I would check with the manufacturer to see if the notch dimensions are acceptable.

RE: Reduced wood beam depth

Keep an eye on any uplift as that puts your notch-ish thing in tension.



I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources