INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

ACI 318 Tie Requirement

ACI 318 Tie Requirement

(OP)
7.10.5.3 in ACI 318 states that "Ties shall be arranged such that every corner and alternate longitudinal bar shall have lateral support provided by the corner of a tie..." I am designing a 24" square column with 4 - #8's on each face. These bars are less than 6" from each other, so no ties would be required for that provision. However, since I have an even number of bar on each face, "every other bar" is different depending on if I measure from the right side or left side of the column face. My question is, would I need to enclose the two interior bars on each face with a tie, even though they are adjacent within 6" to a tie corner? See attached detail. Thanks.

RE: ACI 318 Tie Requirement

Yes, I think so.

RE: ACI 318 Tie Requirement

Yes, all tied based on the alternate rule and the < 6" clear distance rule also.

RE: ACI 318 Tie Requirement

I disagree. As long as you provide a tie on at least 1 of the 2 interior bars, every other bar is still tied.

RE: ACI 318 Tie Requirement

I agree with MotorCity and Jae.

If OP is concerned, you can have alternate cross tie locations, i.e. provide one on the left and the bottom set of face reinforcements and then provide one on the right and the top set of face reinforcements the next.

RE: ACI 318 Tie Requirement

Agree with MC. I've seen standard details for an 8-bar pattern where the side bars are intentionally not centered to avoid the need for the extra ties. Personally, I think that it gets into the realm of the silly. Savings are nominal and QC becomes much more of an issue. Your case is less silly though.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: ACI 318 Tie Requirement

I agree the two dog ties would satisfy the code provisions, but think it is silly to do it that way. Two rectangular ties makes a more secure cage, and leaves no doubt where the vibrator is to go. Another option is to use a second square tie across the corners.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close