×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Centering diagonals vs centering connection gussets

Centering diagonals vs centering connection gussets

Centering diagonals vs centering connection gussets

(OP)
Hi all,

I'm currently learning connections and I would like to debate how does one design the bracing connections in terms of centering to the beams and columns;

Initially I would thought that centering the gusset plate would be better for symmetry of the anchor bolts or beam bolts (see attachment on right), but in practice I have seen people centering the diagonal to the column and leaving the gusset plate eccentric to the column (see attachment on left), which makes more sense for the analysis, since this was made as that.

I'm currently more inclined to the right option because the eccentricity is small for the columns and beams and I'm somehow tight in this particular connection.

What do you think about it? Do you have any preference?

Best regards.

RE: Centering diagonals vs centering connection gussets

I prefer to leave the beam centered and offset the gusset. If you center the gusset and offset the beam, there's still eccentricity in the system, it's just a different eccentricity (the beam is what delivers the load after all).

At the end of the day, I don't feel that the minor eccentricity matters much from a technical perspective. We're assembling buildings here, not pianos. And I think it would be awkward to try have all your beams offset that tiny amount, particularly if that amount is changing in different situations.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Centering diagonals vs centering connection gussets

Offset the connection material. The primary structure should not conform to its connection, rather the other way around. This is especially true with perimeter beams where offsetting the beam can have major consequences on cladding details. In regards to bracing and the location of gussets, it depends on the bracing type. If it's a single sided connection to the gusset, you may want to have both gusset and brace offset so the faying surface is on centerline of the beam/column. Double sided brace connections, the gusset could obviously be centred. Typically, the minor eccentricity formed can often be ignored (except in the case of compression loading for single sided bracing connections).

RE: Centering diagonals vs centering connection gussets

I agree with the above. Offset the gusset.

One typically designs the brace for eccentric connecting material, but not the column/beam it's connected to.
For example, see Table 4-12 in the AISC manual, which accounts for eccentric loading due to the offset gusset on an angle shape.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources