×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

High Slump Concrete
6

High Slump Concrete

High Slump Concrete

(OP)
I have a contractor who has had some issues on a previous job with the concrete showing up at the site with a higher slump then specified and allowed the pour to continue anyways. On this previous job, the concrete strengths came out low consistently across many of the pours and caused a bunch of issues. We are now in the construction phase of a new job that is very similar to this one with all of the same players (engineer, architect, owner, contractor, and concrete provider). This contractor wants to ensure that the concrete poured is acceptable and has asked us (the EOR) to allow them to add a bag of cement to the concrete mix if they should encounter a high slump while pouring.

My first thought is that this is a bad idea as it changes the mix design that the concrete provider is providing. I would assume that once you alter the mix, the provider may no longer have any liability for the concrete and it would fall on the contractors (or engineers) shoulders. At the end of the day I believe that adding some cement would probably only help the mix, but I don't want to be the one responsible for the concrete when the provider should be providing concrete with the correct slump in the first place.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Is it acceptable to add cement to a concrete truck with a high slump? Has anyone run into this issue before? Any input would be helpful.

Thanks in advance!

RE: High Slump Concrete

High slump concrete with weak concrete indicates to me you should probably be sending the trucks back. Let the contractor know you won't accept this and they should be stricter about QC with their supplier.

RE: High Slump Concrete

(OP)
@ oldestguy, I had found that article but wanted to see about real world experience as well. The contractor was mainly concerned with the fact that he takes the slump test at the middle of the truck so they are already pouring so by the time they find out that the slump is high, it is too late.

RE: High Slump Concrete

High slump is not normally good... the truck should be allowed to mix the concrete until the maximum time for transit and if still outside slump range, it should be rejected.

Added: Slump test sampling should be as per usual...

Dik

RE: High Slump Concrete

have the inspector check the batch ticket for water and figure out w/c ratio. I imagine its a problem with that. If w/c ratio is normal but with high slump, then admixtures were likely used but strength should not be a big concern. Was w/c ratio OK in the previous project and still low strength?

RE: High Slump Concrete

(OP)
I don't recall them measuring the w/c ratio at the field so I am unsure if it was ok when they poured.

RE: High Slump Concrete

In that case the extra-sack-of-cement fix won't solve the problem either. This is on the contractor and his concrete supplier to fix.

The guys placing the concrete can probably call the slump when it drops from the chute. If it is suspect, have the sampler pull a slump then and send that truck down the road if it isn't in spec.

RE: High Slump Concrete

High slump can cause excessive shrinkage, difficulty finishing and bleedwater issues... not good.

Dik

RE: High Slump Concrete

Stenbrook - I suggest that you (EOR) have the Contractor set up a joint meeting with concrete supplier before approving anything. The concrete supplier is the one who needs to be asked (and answer) the "hard" questions about the problems before any action is taken.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: High Slump Concrete

I would have the contractor address this with the concrete supplier in advance. You can be part of this conversation too if you want. I would give the supplier fore-warning that you will be sending trucks back if they do not meet the slump requirements.

Additionally, if the job is large enough, request that the concrete supplier's salesperson be on site for the first few trucks to make sure everything gets off to smooth start.

RE: High Slump Concrete

To protect yourself, as EOR, from arguments and possible free services, You should write a letter to the GC, sub contractor, and those who relate that any trucks with concrete that does not meet the specified requirements will be rejected immediately, concrete placed that has issues due to poor mix will be the contractor and supplier responsibility to correct at no cost to owner or EOR or Inspectors.

Something like that will put them on notice. There will be phone calls and emails but in the end they will step up by providing the right concrete.

Don't allow field modifications except those directed by the supplier (and done by the supplier!) at the time of issue. If their immediate fix doesn't correct the issue by batch-to-placement times then the truck is rejected. 90 mins don't reset/start again after they mess with mix... I've had that argument before :)

RE: High Slump Concrete

Its the responsibility of the concrete supplier to run the numbers using the increased amount of cement and determine the resulting design strength. I don't necessarily agree that adding cement will offset the effect of a high slump. It sounds to me that the assumption is that the high slump is due to extra water. Assuming that's true, adding cement will help the mix by evening out the w/c ratio. However, I see 3 issues. First, the high slump could be due to incorrect amount of plasticizers being added. Second, just adding cement will not give you the same mix design. You also need to add the fine aggregate and coarse aggregate proportionally also in order to achieve the original mix design. Third, even if adding cement is the right solution, how do you know that a bag of cement is the correct amount to add?

RE: High Slump Concrete

No. No. No! Do not modify the mix design. That is the purview of the ready-mix supplier. Keep them responsible for the mix design.

Any modifications of the mix design in the field should be done by the QC representative of the supplier.

If you are having low strengths you need to understand why. Is it because your finishers are adding water at the site? Is it because the supplier is not providing the specified slump at delivery?

Low strengths are usually a result of adulteration of the mix design. Adding cement without consideration of other mix properties will increase shrinkage and will likely present placement issues.

RE: High Slump Concrete

Listen to Ron. Slump is only an indicator of consistency, not necessarily of strength. Do not allow the contractor to add anything at site. A few rejected trucks should get the attention of the supplier.

RE: High Slump Concrete

I agree with the previous posts. Don't approve anything, this isn't your problem to get involved with or to solve.

There are a lot of people saying that the trucks should be rejected. In my experience, it is inappropriate for an inspector to approve or reject anything. They are simply there to observe what it being built. So to the folks calling for rejected trucks - are you suggesting that the EOR or a representative from their office be physically present on site to observe the slump results and reject trucks? Is it appropriate for an EOR to reject a truck if the slump is 1/2" too high? Granted it wouldn't be nice, but I`m not sure I understand where there is language present to justify this course of action.

Honestly, it seems to me like they're going to pour the concrete they're going to pour. You can take a hard stance, make it well known to the supplier, contractor, and owner that they need to step up their game. After that, make sure everyone is aware that concrete that doesn't meet strength or is excessively cracked will need to be removed and replaced at the contractor's expense (including the additional testing, observations, any applicable design time/meetings, etc).

RE: High Slump Concrete

Once20036,

Yes, that may be the old fashioned way, but when I have rejected trucks, it worked. The modern trend of separating design from construction monitoring doesn't seem to be working very well.

It is incumbent on the designer to provide language that allows him to reject faulty material at any stage of construction, including before it is installed. Not an inspector, but certainly the engineer.

1/2" is not a big issue with slump. As I said before, slump is only a useful indicator of consistency. Nothing more. But if you want 4" slump, and the first truck arrives with 7", don't dilly around. Solve the problem before it gets out of hand.

RE: High Slump Concrete

(OP)
I have told the contractor that nothing is to be added to the concrete mix. I will say that this whole "can we add a bag of cement" is the contractor trying to CYA in case the concrete comes in bad. His explanation is that he can't turn the truck around because they don't take the slump test until the truck is half poured so what is he supposed to do, tell them to pick up the concrete they already poured?? He is just looking for ways to fix any issues beforehand because of the issues we had previously. In my opinion, the concrete supplier did a really bad job on the last job(I don't know how you have issues getting to 3,000psi strength when it is probably the most common mix out there), and the GC should have used someone else for this job but for some reason they didn't. Either way, thank you all for your input.

RE: High Slump Concrete

Instruct them to check the slump at the beginning of the load, not the middle. And if the slump is too high, you should reject it rather than leaving it to the contractor.

Do you still use 3000 psi concrete? Where I am, that is not considered to be structural grade concrete. If they can't even provide that, your quality is severely compromised.

RE: High Slump Concrete

The language I would use is "concrete is not to spec and is therefore rejected as not per the contract documents." Tell the contractor to carefully document where he intends to place that concrete because you don't want him to have to demolish anymore of the placed concrete than he has to. That should be clear enough and it allows the contractor to assume his full responsibility as the construction coordinator (there might be a valid reason that he must use the concrete? Maybe practice his concrete eraser skills?). As for the slump test, the initial slump test (and air) is for the contractor so that he doesn't place the garbage. The middle of the batch and the in-situ air test is the one we want as engineers.

RE: High Slump Concrete

Maybe someone can explain for me why you would use a slump cone in the middle of the batch. Why not at the beginning, when it will perhaps do some good? Slump, concrete temperature, air content if applicable, at the beginning.

RE: High Slump Concrete

hokie66 - Agree that is ridiculous, but can imagine that someone not familiar with construction would think that performing the slump test in the middle of a batch would be the "best" measurement of the "average" slump for that batch. Bet it does happen.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: High Slump Concrete

Obviously it does, by comments here.

RE: High Slump Concrete

3
The slump for acceptance of the load should be performed when the truck arrives at the site as SRE and hokie66 have noted. To do otherwise is absurd. The slump for record purposes to conform to ASTM standards (in the US) is to be done in the middle third of the load. Horse is out of the barn...too late to close the barn door. Do both and report both.

I agree with hokie66 that there should be a provision in the specs to allow for rejection of the load at the time of delivery. I spent many years working for one of the top engineering testing firms in the US....our lawyers never wanted us to accept or reject anything and we followed that directive; however, if you have the responsibility to observe and report, that reporting can be oral and immediate.....example....
Tell the contractor that the concrete does not meet the specifications and if he places it he will be responsible for the cost of removal and replacement because it does not comply.....if that doesn't work, tell the contractor that you are required to inform the engineer of record about non-conforming materials and you will do so immediately by phone. If the EOR says it is not acceptable, he has rejected it and if placed, could result in a lawsuit.

I have "inspected", tested and rejected lots of concrete over the years. Now I investigate failures resulting from those who don't reject bad concrete and from those who place bad concrete.....both get sued.

Remember....good concrete is made from cement, water and aggregates. Bad concrete is made from the same materials.

RE: High Slump Concrete

Ron, what, if you know, is the reason for the ASTM standard that calls for "record purposes" taking the slump in the middle of the load? The slump records tell you little about the characteristics of the hardened concrete. Is there a similar requirement for the test cylinders to be taken from the middle? Are these requirements typically in project specifications in the US, or do specifications default to ASTM, ACI, etc?

RE: High Slump Concrete

Ron correctly points out the problem with the ASTM test procedure (as well as BS or now the EN standards). The horse is out of the barn is a good analogy. Project specifications never seem to address this issue - do the slump before placing or do it the ASTM way. Also the point of "rejection" responsibility is highlighted. I've been on jobs where the full control of Quality Control is that of the Contractor - the Engineer has no "right" to stop the job . . . I find this outlandish . . . but this is one reason that an inspector needs to have a good relationship with the Contractor - so that they are on the same page and both wanting to get the job done right. In my case, many times, it is the temperature at delivery that has been a problem. I made several "stinks" in the initial placements sort of coercing the contractor leader to reject the truck - wanting to set the groundrules. It worked and the concrete supplier got his act together.

Perhaps much of this might be handled if a meeting of all parties prior to concrete work were to be had and all these "bugs" and "issues" addressed with all parties knowing what is expected and what will not be accepted. Supposedly this happens, but likely far too many times it doesn't.

hokie66 The concrete cylinders, too, in ASTM and BS/EN both require them to be composite samples from various parts of the transit mixer; i.e., 3 samples (or 4 if Britsh) to be all mixed together to form the material to be consolidated into the moulds.

So Ron . . . how should specifications really be written to address on this issue?? . . . I have seen occasions where the first bit of concrete out of the transit mixer is dry - and as the mixer discharges the concrete becomes more and more "wet" (so to speak). In such cases, I've forced a stop to the placement and had another slump taken (contractors, at least here, do not do the proper ASTM/BS/EN composite for slumps.

RE: High Slump Concrete

BigInch,

Yes, temperature at delivery is a big issue in hot climates, like where I am, and where you are, I believe. It is really irritating to take all the time to write a complete specification for hot weather concreting, only to arrive at site on the first day and find that the technician has no concrete thermometer.

RE: High Slump Concrete

As BigH correctly points out, the sample is to be a composite sample. That's another issue with the ASTM Standard. When concrete is being placed conventionally (not pumped for instance), the process can be relatively slow, sometimes taking 30 minutes or more to place. The compositing is to be done within a 15 minute time span, and volumetrically by thirds of the volume. That's difficult to do and often the technician will just pull from the middle of the batch.

Each time the technician queues up to take a bit of sample, the crew has to stop....even if only for a few seconds. Contractors don't like this annoyance.

Here are a few suggestions for specification inclusion:

1. Require a pre-placement conference with all parties involved. Lay out all the parameters of inspection, testing, acceptance/rejection, etc. Make it clear to all that these are the rules of concrete placement and rejection is the result if not followed. Have a sign-in sheet and take minutes for distribution. This should be done in advance of the expected start of placement, but only by a few days so it is still fresh in everyone's mind when the placement starts.

2. Require a mix design submittal and make sure the technician has a copy.

3. Make sure all the equipment on the transit mixers is working properly....site glass on the water tank, revolution counter, etc. Preferably do an NRMCA or similar plant audit prior to placement (National Ready Mix Concrete Association in the US).

4. When concrete arrives at the jobsite, check the trip ticket first. This does two things. It puts the driver on notice that someone is paying attention and it confirms the mix design and mix time. Pay attention to mix times, particularly in hot weather as hokie66 notes.

5. Have the driver mix with 40 to 60 mixing speed revolutions of the drum. Take a slump test. If within spec, proceed with placement and sample according to the standard. If not in spec, have the Ready Mix supplier's QA person adjust the mix to spec. They know their mix design better than anyone else on the job and it is their responsibility to deliver within spec. He/She might authorize some water addition at the site or might require more mixing with drum revolutions....keeping in mind that there should be a limit on total revolutions of somewhere in the 300 revolution range to prevent additional heat build-up in the mix.

6. If the mix cannot be brought to spec by the QA rep, then follow the rejection protocol established in the pre-placement conference.

7. If within spec, proceed with placement and sampling.

hokie66....agree....an unprepared technician does not need to be on the job. Thermometer, clean slump cone and base, rod, air meter, wheelbarrow, ice scoop, bucket, water....all necessary.

RE: High Slump Concrete

Good list Ron:

Item 2: Under the Canadian concrete code, CSA A23, the mix design is considered proprietary and does not have to be presented.

Dik

RE: High Slump Concrete

dik...Thanks.

Fortunately not the case in the US. We always require a mix design submittal.

RE: High Slump Concrete

hokie66...you bring up why ASTM standards are frustrating at times. I've been on various committees in ASTM and as a voting member it is frustrating to get a standards provision in place. Often the committees have an imbalance of suppliers and design professionals, so the suppliers block the necessary changes such as what you have mentioned.

Yes, the sampling requirement is for compositing, which is most practical near the middle third of the load. It applies to both slump and compressive strength specimens.

The slump has two "consistency" components. The first is the consistency of viscosity....that's the one specifications cover. The second is consistency from batch to batch. Both are relatively important and yes, the slump does have some influence on the hardened concrete....mostly in its durability, finishing and shrinkage. Slump has little relevance to structural compliance as it is easy to meet a compressive strength requirement with almost any slump.

RE: High Slump Concrete

ASTM is a committee. Concrete producers have put the lockdown on all the tests so that delivered goods get placed and then you figure out acceptability after the fact. Measuring water content of fresh concrete by microwave has been in committee for the last 20 years i figure, although AASHTO does it... The last thing the industry wants is for people to have the ability to say that w/c is exceeded in the field by review of batch weights and field water testing.

But, the concrete industry looks like rookies when you see what the masonry and mortar cement producers have pulled off in their respective ASTM committees.

RE: High Slump Concrete

DSG....amen!!

I've been trying to get the word "nominal" removed from the stucco standard for 10 years and replaced with a tolerance. Gets blocked every time.

RE: High Slump Concrete

This is silly. The Concrete Slump Test is largely intended to check the Workability of the mix. What good does it do to test workability when only half the batch is left. The Minnesota DOT specifies that the Slump Test shall be taken after the first 1/3 of a yard has been discharged. Strength tests are to be taken in the middle of a batch. So maybe the contractor is just trying to consolidate interruptions to the work but a supplier that is having trouble delivering 3000psi concrete, both in slump & strength, sounds like Shenanigans. Honestly, if the concrete were being pumped and the Ready-Mix supplier had had jobs where the mix separated and plugged the hose, does anyone think the Concrete Pumping contractor would proceed without having assurances the slump was within spec beforehand? If concrete strength samples are to be taken from the middle of the load to simulate average strength and a slump test fails at the middle of the batch, doesn't it strongly suggest that the first half discharged is crap and the pour should stop? Even if a bag of cement were to remedy the slump what good does it do to place good concrete on top of bad. Why would a the contractor take on the problems of the concrete supplier and why would they both want the EOR to join the merry band of fools?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources