INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

(OP)
I work for a utility that is reviewing its standard protection package for substation transformers at the moment.

At present, we provide each transformer with redundant differential relays from the same blue-box manufacturer. In each relay, we set timed overcurrent elements to back up the downstream bus, and high-set instantaneous overcurrent elements on the source side of the transformer. The instantaneous overcurrent is set above the maximum through-fault current for the transformer, so it will only operate for faults on the source side winding. The intent with the instantaneous overcurrent element is that, in conjunction with the Buchholz or fast gas relay, it provides an alternate algorithm to the differential elements that protects the majority of the transformer (we aren't as concerned about high-speed clearing of faults on the load-side winding as these have less impact on our transmission system).

My question is--are other companies (mainly utilities) still setting instantaneous overcurrents on transformers? On the one hand, the cost of setting them is negligible since the relay already includes the element and the calculation and testing is very straight-forward; on the other hand, transformer differential must be one of the protection elements that is least likely to fail to trip, and so adding an unnecessary protection element is just one more possible inadvertent trip. We've never had a phase overcurrent element misoperate (to my knowledge), but we have had issues with the occasional over-optimistically-set ground overcurrent elements.

Thoughts? Comments?

Thanks,
mgtrp

RE: Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

On smaller transformers, we used to only use 1 differential relay, plus an overcurrent relay as a backup. We would add the instantaneous o/c element to the backup relay.

These days we mostly use 2 separate differential relays on all new installations, and wouldn't add an inst o/c trip to these relays.

RE: Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

As you said, " the cost of setting them is negligible since the relay already includes the element" and "We've never had a phase overcurrent element misoperate (to my knowledge)", is there a problem?

Ground elements maybe a little more of an issue, yes. But, if it's not a problem, and is of no additional cost, why are you interested in not using it?

And is the transformer not one of your biggest cost transmission elements?

RE: Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

(OP)
It stems from a general philosophy of using protection elements in a relay because you need them, not because they're available. Modern protection relays have so many features and functions included that you can end up drowning in complexity if you do not draw a few lines! In this specific case, the thought is that if the transformer is fully protected by the redundant differential elements, what benefit is the overcurrent element?

As mentioned, we do presently set these elements, but were curious as to whether industry thinking was going away from this.

Thanks,
mgtrp

RE: Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

We also use a single differential with a separate overcurrent backup.

SEL-501 and 551 relays are pretty inexpensive.

RE: Need for Transformer Instantaneous Overcurrent

At one time the high side CTR was set to match the transformer ratio and low side capacity, which would result in some low CTR's on the high side of the transformer. These low CTR's can in many cases saturate under a high fault current, which would result in delayed tripping of the differential.

To counter this, 50 element is use with a much higher CTR. This 50 element would be faster than the differential in many cases, even though the differential was in theory faster.

So if you have low CTR's you want to keep the 50 element. But as a universal package, as I am expected to provide, I must include the 50 because some of the applications require it.

Does that help?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close