INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

QSL and welding NDE for pipeline valves

QSL and welding NDE for pipeline valves

(OP)
Dear valve/standard professional,

Appreciate shall someone can advise over QSL (API 6D) and welding inspection requirement for pipeline valves.
Long story short, circa half year ago my team inquire pipeline metal seated fully welded ball valve 24" with pup piece subject to be buried for 30 years. QSL 1 (due to its relatively low pressure 10 bar operating,design class 300Psig and carbon steel material). Standard applied without collaborating further are API 6D, ISO 14313, NEN and some internal pipeline standards.
Challenge now is valve about to be FAT'd, however the not so informed inspector (he is literally involved and informed only for the past 2 weeks) quite stringent over the statement within internal standard that all welded part subject for X-ray. Thus, pup piece to body connction as well as other welded areas must be X-ray'd. And the "why don't do X-ray then to ensure the welding result?" popped out. He treat valve integrated part same as pipe to pipe welding connection

Understanding that specifying unnecessarily stringent NDE procedures and acceptance standards will impose increased costs and add time to the manufacturing process whilst adding no value to the product.
My question are:
- what define QSL 1, 2, 3 and 4?
- If QSL 3 and 4 is stringent for X-ray or UT inspection, why does for similar valve design (fully welded) with similar welding location however subject for QSL 1 is not required or that stringent to be NDE? in regards with adding no value, (with all due respect to welders) does welding A105 against one another by ASME certified welder is very unlikely to have flaw?
- What is the practicable NDE process to ensure ALARP welding result (that could last 30 years)?

Note:
a. My mitigation is this valve already PED (tested at 1,43 x MAWP for 2,5 hours) and visually inspected. LP was performed as per ISO 14313. Hence we treat this PED valve (w/ pup piece) as one integral component. Is this NDE sufficient?
b. Valve condition present? Gouging the weld (as per manufacturer request to inspect the red circle) is highly not preferred


Thank you in advance for the feedback.
Regards,
MR

https://nosuchvalve.com
All valves will last for years, except the ones that were poorly manufactured; are still wrongly operated and or were wrongly selected

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?&rat1=2&f...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close