MIL-STD-1913
MIL-STD-1913
(OP)
Regarding MIL-STD-1913, I just came across this jewel. The document is available on http://quicksearch.dla.mil and the following should be a link directly to the page (saving having to type 1913 into the top search box.)
http://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsDocDetails.aspx?ident...
Is there any rule they managed to follow? Pay attention to the 1999 amendment to the section diagram.
http://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsDocDetails.aspx?ident...
Is there any rule they managed to follow? Pay attention to the 1999 amendment to the section diagram.





RE: MIL-STD-1913
RE: MIL-STD-1913
Instead, we create our own drawing the closely follows MIL-1913, and then verify that our Rail actually fits the mating part before producing the full quantity.
--Scott
www.aerornd.com
RE: MIL-STD-1913
In the 1999 amendment, are you referring to the "R 2X .060 MAX" being out of order? That's all I see changed.
Regarding the rest of the tolerancing, I wrote up some of my thoughts in thread1103-406027: Seemingly incomplete tolerancing, reality check needed. Perhaps it will be of interest.
pylfrm
RE: MIL-STD-1913