×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

(OP)
Hello,

I am a mech. engineer who often uses AISC design guides for designing frames and other steel structures. In our industry we are required by mil. spec to have a factor of safety of 5X to ultimate on the equipment we design/build. When using the ASD method what are your thoughts on coming up with ASD inputs corresponding to a simple FOS? For example, what I typically do is take Load*5/1.67 as my input. As I understand this would account for the 5X factor of safety with an omega=1.67.

Thanks

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

Omega varies depending on the limit state, right? Make sure you don't multiple that ratio to the frame loads, rather only when comparing capacity and demand.

The real question is if using that ratio reasonably approximates the goal of providing the same probability of failure per the Mil spec. I am not familiar with the Mil spec, but I suspect your method is reasonable in most cases.

One in the hand is worth two in the bush.

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

I am not familiar with AISC codes, or N America standard practice, but as far as I am concerned an ultimate FoS of 5 means that the structure should not fail when subject to the specified load x 5.

The only way to check that is to calculate the failure load.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

All AISC design provisions start by calculating the nominal capacity, i.e., a capacity without any safety factor. The design spec is equally valid for ASD and LRFD type analysis. Both start from the nominal capacity, then adjust by either safety factor (ASD) or resistance factor (LRFD). Simply calculate the nominal capacity then divide by your Mil Spec factor of safety of 5.0 to get an allowable capacity at working strength loads.

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

ASME BTH is a design guide for below-the-hook lifting assemblies. While it might not be applicable to your work, it might be of interest to look through. It is based on AISC design, but has the factor safety/ design factor broken out.

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

Whenever possible we try to work these safety factors into the allowable side and even then it is complicated because many of the equations use Fy and the ratio between Fy and Fu is not constant.
For A36 steel and using Fu = 58 ksi then 58/5 = 11.6 ksi and 5/1.67 = 2.99 or 3 and 36/3 = 12 ksi 5:1 on ultimate = 3:1 on yield. Note the reciprocal of 1.67 is the 0.6 in Fb = .6 Fy.
For A992 steel or other Gr. 50 material where Fu = 65 then 65/5 = 13 ksi and 50/3.85 = 13 ksi. 5:1 on ultimate = 3.85:1 on yield.
Attached is a chart showing AISI (cold formed steel) safety factors. I have not seen a similar chart for AISC or ever tried to derive one.

https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/ste... is a link to a pdf article that has tables showing Fy and Fu for different grades of steel and fasteners.

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

I often have to show FOS when working on machines. I just take the extra step of calculating yield/stress or tensile/stress and show the FOS. I've found manipulating the loads provides for confusing reviewers and adding unnecessary explanation and introduced doubt. The few minutes it takes to hand calc the FOS is worth it in my opinion.

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

steele - you are definitely echoing what I was mentioning.

One in the hand is worth two in the bush.

RE: Converting ASD to simple Factor of Safety

AISC's Engineering Journal article from 2006, Q4 entitled "Technical Note: Determination of Allowable Strength Design Safety Factors in the 2005 AISC Specification" Link lists safety factors and resistance factors based upon element type and limit state.

Part copy:

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources