×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

(OP)
I am going to be supporting a piece of equipment (dynamic considerations need not be considered) on a large 17.5' x 10.5' concrete pedestal (more like a mat). That pedestal will be sitting on top of a large concrete mat foundation.

I am needing to prescribe the amount/size of dowels that will be used to secure this pedestal to my foundation.

I feel as though I should not be using ACI's requirement of 0.005*Ag in this case because that would yield roughly 130 in^2 worth of dowels (17.5*10.5*144*0.005).

Has anyone had some experience with this type of situation before? What should I be considering when prescribing the dowels area of steel needed. TIA!



RE: Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

Assuming the pedestal is "thick", consider where the dowels should go. IMHO, with no dynamic loading, the perimeter of the pedestal is the only location dowels are needed.
Assume the dowels are located 3" inside the pedestal faces.
Dowel location perimeter is 17'+10'+17'+10' = 54'
Say, a dowel is located every 6" along the dowel perimeter - therefore 108 dowels are needed. 130 in2 / 108 dowels = 1.2 in2 / dowel. This gives #10 bars for dowels @ 6".

I would temper that math with engineering judgement. Consider the size and spacing of rebar used for the pedestal - dowels most likely should be similar size and spacing. So, maybe #6, #7, or #8 dowels with spacing to match pedestal rebar.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

If you designed the pedestal and the slab below as one composite slab, then you'd need reinforcing for whatever shear force you calculate at the interface.

RE: Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

I don't know how tall the "pedestal" is (you made it sound like it's more like a mat, or perhaps a house keeping pad)......however, for vertical steel in such a situation (with "tall" pedestals) I've always considered a effective perimeter acting as a wall. (And reinforced as such.) Maybe about a foot of width. It depends on how much area you need for headed stud/dowel anchorage. (And also crack control.)

RE: Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

Quote (OP)

I feel as though I should not be using ACI's requirement of 0.005*Ag

I agree. The minimum reinforcing quantity originated as a means of preventing concrete creep from passively yielding the reinforcement in compression members. For that creep to occur, you'd need some minimum amount of compression stress in the concrete. With a 170 SF "pedestal", I doubt that you're there. Consequently, I don't feel that the ACI minimum applies here.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Dowels Needed: Large Pedestal to Mat Foundation

(OP)
@JStephen This equipment has little to no shear forces. 20kip self weight only.

@KootK thank you for shining some light on how the provision came about. I feel better about prescribing a lesser steel amount now.

@SlideRuleEra I like your comments on an effective area. This piece of equipment sits on a skid. The skid runs 2 main beams down the length of the equipment. I am thinking about considering the effective area as the area beneath the 2beams at a 45 deg angle down to the mat because more or less this would be the area which is being engaged.







Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources