×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

(OP)
I am doing residential framing design in the Austin, Texas area. I have a client who would like to build stud walls with utility grade lumber at the top plate. He has pointed out to me that several engineers in my area allow this. I have tried to verify that this is acceptable with an engineering calculation, but have not been able to prove that it works, especially since I assume one of the plates is spliced. I also have not been able to find a code reference that requires the plates to be #2.

Does anyone here allow top plates in stud walls to be built with #3 or utility grade lumber?

Thanks.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

Yes, if the studs are directly placed beneath the supported joists/trusses.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

The top plates serve to primarily provide a tension/compression diaphragm chord and transfer the joist load above onto the studs. If you calculate that stud grade lumber satisfies that criteria for your loads, there shouldn't be an issue.

If you're designing a taller building, shrinkage and moisture content would become a concern in the horizontally oriented plates.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

(OP)
The studs will not necessarily align with the rafters and joists.

The primary concern I have is weak axis bending of the plate between the supporting studs.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

This comes up often here with regard to plate capacity (not utility grade specific). Search the term "top plate" here and several exhaustive threads will manifest themselves. Folks have tried complex things with modelling continuity, considering random splice locations, accounting for sheathing support, etc. Long story short: it doesn't work real well by the numbers without the alignment but, still, nothing seems to go awry in practice.

A lower grade of material just worsens the problem, to the extent that there is one.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

zlindauer... To support your primary concern, here in Wisconsin, with snow loads, unbalanced snow loads, and the ever-increasing truss spans, nearly 20 years ago, I've forced our main General contractor to use SPF #2 (or better) triple top-plates to support the 24" o.c. trusses between the 16" o.c. studs. On occasion, I've specified a DFL #2 bearing plate on CMU to support the high Fc... primarily a different situation.

Contrary to my typical tendency and practice over being allegedly "over" conservative, I have never considered the splice location(s). As Koot stated, nothing "seems" to go awry in practice. I suppose that the splice may "survive" our concern by becoming a naturally transformed participant of a successful 8" diaphragmatic cantilever. My explanation is a stretch, but, in my opinion, there is often the occurrence of a mysterious, inconclusive, successful load-path that I am often content to accept.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

In Houston, many production builders will use #3 utility grade lumber for top plates with studs under all the splices.

How nice of a house is it? The sheetrocker that has to attach sheetrock to that top plate, so when you get large regions of bark or 'rounded edges' it will make the top of the wall wavy.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

Even if you could show on paper that it was acceptable, my question to the contractor would be - why bother? What are the savings in switching just the top plate for a lower grade? A few cents a foot of wall? With the lower grade you'll probably end up tossing out a few 16ft lengths that are too crooked or banged up to use anyway - so there goes your savings. There are better ways to save a few dollars on a project.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

CANPRO, the devil's advocate position that the contractor may suggest would be to repeat the question to you: 'Why bother?' ... if it's not needed, why use #2?

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

I think around here anything longer than 10' is #2. I have actually never considered the top plate grade.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

Our notes state that the plate materials must meet or exceed the grade of the studs. That being said, I've never spec'd lower than a #2 stud unless it was a storage shed.

RE: Wood Framing - Top Plate Material

(OP)
Thanks to everyone for replying.

One last detail: The contractor is asking for forgiveness, not permission. They've already built several houses with #3 plates and got called out by a city inspector.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources