×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Dynamic Lateral Soil Load for Soil Below the Water Table

## Dynamic Lateral Soil Load for Soil Below the Water Table

(OP)
Hello All,

I have a question regarding the lateral loading condition on a buried structure that is below the water table.

The static condition is quite simple, At-Rest buoyant soil plus hydrostatic. However, when we need to consider seismic things get quite a bit more complicated. I have done quite a bit of reading and there appears to be little research and many differing opinions on how to consider things:

1. If we have with Conditions relatively dense materials say less than 10^-4 m/s permeability:

1A - Consider the M-O for yielding or Wood for non-yielding, use the FULL density of soil including the water. Then do we need to add the hydro static water load as well some say yes some say no?

1B - Consider the M-O or Wood equation using the buoyant density of soil then add the hydrostatic load, no consideration of any hydrodynamic.

2. If we have Conditions relatively "un-dense" materials say greater 10^-4 m/s permeability:

2A - Loose granular soils to boulders or 1 foot rip rap - Consider the M-O or Wood equation with buoyant density then either:

ii) add hydro dynamic based on Westerguard and do not add hydrostatic

i) do not add hydro dynamic based on Westerguard but add hydrostatic

2B - Loose granular soils to uncompacted boulders or 1 foot rip rap - Consider the M-O or Wood equation with FULL density then add hydrostatic or not?

There were some other articles that had a very complicated method for considering the amount of hydrodynamic to consider based on varying degrees of permeability!

Im sure there are many other combinations so I am looking for some Geotech input on what people recommend using.

Thanks

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!