×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Composite-deck modelling in ETABS

Composite-deck modelling in ETABS

Composite-deck modelling in ETABS

(OP)
Hi,

Should the composite deck in ETABS be modelled as rigid diaphragm or a semi-rigid diaphragm? I know diaphragm needs to be modelled as semi-rigid when there is significant in-plane deformation. What does this mean? What is the limit for this?

Also, ASCE states that a diaphragm should not be treated as rigid when there is horizontal irregularity. My building has horizontal irregularity. So do you think modeling the diaphragm as semi-rigid is the way to go? When I model the diaphragm as rigid vs semi-rigid, the results in the braces are significantly different.

Thanks

RE: Composite-deck modelling in ETABS

What is your diaphragm (concrete slab, slab on metal deck deck etc)?
How did you calculate your semi-rigid diaphragm properties? If concrete did you apply a cracked factor modification to the stiffness?

A post of your diaphragm layout could be helpful as well.


RE: Composite-deck modelling in ETABS

(OP)
Its a concrete on metal deck.

I used the thickness of concrete above flutes to model the semi-rigid diaphragm. Yup, crack modification of 0.5 has been applied

RE: Composite-deck modelling in ETABS

This is a little outside my knowledge area (designer in the midwest) but I'll take a stab at it.

My guess as to why a diaphragm needs to modeled as semi-rigid when there is a horizontal irregularity is due to the expectation of high in-plane deformation of your diaphragm (think of your diaphragm as a hopefully a deep beam that needs to span out to the other portions of the disrupted LFRS).

Also if you are in ETABs, I am guessing you have the capability to determine the diaphragm shear that needs to be resisted by taking cut planes through your semi rigid diaphragm. You can compare the output of these shears to your allowable diaphragm shears and see if your diaphragm is sufficent.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources