Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.


FFT real amplitude value

FFT real amplitude value


I want to implement the fast fourier transformation on an aperiodic signal, which you can see in the next picture:

The first question came here, can I use the FFT in an aperiodic singnal?
Once I execute the matlab code I obtain the output of the transformation, which you cant see in the next picture:

As you can see, the first value (DC offset) is correct and it corresponds with the offset of the signal, but the remaining values of the amplitude of the FFT does not corresponf with the real values of the amplitude of the signal, and the FFT notmalization is done. Why this colud be possible?

Thank you!

RE: FFT real amplitude value

?? FFT amplitude is the amplitude of the individual frequency, which you cannot see in the time series.

Moreover, because it's aperiodic, you probably used a window to kill the aliasing . The FFT implicitly calculates as if your signal were periodic relative to your window, which may result in aliasing and other deleterious effects.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
FAQ731-376: Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list

RE: FFT real amplitude value

subtract the constant term in your FFT data and replot,
your amplitudes are fine,

RE: FFT real amplitude value

I think that there are not fine, look at the real amplitudes there is one in the range of 5 and that is not represent in the FFT amplitude values.

RE: FFT real amplitude value

You realize the amplitudes sum at some points in time, and subtract at other points in time?

RE: FFT real amplitude value

When you seek the spectral content of your data, the constant (or average dc term) is of secondary importance, so you remove it from the figure. What's left is the amplitude spectra absent the dc term.

As one of the earlier responders has suggested, windowing is encouraged, to avoid mis-representing the actual data stream.

Without a proper window, you have basically assumed that your data repeats itself indefinitely. There are a number of excellent texts covering the matter.

RE: FFT real amplitude value

FFT -- Fast Fourier Transform -- transform a time-domain signal into a frequency domain "signal;" essentially, your "real" (time-domain) signal is assumed to be constructed from a Fourier series with arbitrary phases.

Unless there is a single dominant frequency, each point of the "real" signal will be a sum of contributions of every wavelength in your FFT. In many cases, you need to run short-term FFTs or Wigner transforms if the frequencies or their amplitudes are not constant over time.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
FAQ731-376: Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list

RE: FFT real amplitude value


Quote (IRstuff (Aerospace))

Quote (hacksaw (Mechanical))

I think that both of you are correct encouraging me to use a window function to reduce the spectral leackage, but I understand that the window function depends on the frecuencies and the amplitudes that you have in your data. Have a look at the next pictures that represent two different periods of my signal. If you see them more in detail, you can notice that they have different frecuencies and also different amplitudes within the same frecuency.

That pictures represent only two of the vast amount of periods I have, so I understand that I have to use a different window function for each and also a different resolution (fs/N) for each to catch the real amplitude of the frecuencies I want.

RE: FFT real amplitude value


You are currently using the default FFT windowing, that presumes that your data set automatically repeats itself with a period equal to the time interval of the data.

The term "windowing" refers to various means for tapering off the time series to avoid "leakage effects" or frequency content that does not represent your data.

There are a half-dozen "windows" to choose from, if the data is semi-periodic common to fluid movement, Hilbert-Huang transforms are commonly used, but that in itself is anouther topic.

RE: FFT real amplitude value

So I have to "window" my signal as you can see in the picture, you can also notice that I remove the offset of the signal.

And now I implement again the FFT with this signal, and this is the output.

It still doesn't represent the real value of the amplitude, any idea?

RE: FFT real amplitude value

Sorry I used the Hamming windowing function:

RE: FFT real amplitude value


What does your autocorrelation look like?

RE: FFT real amplitude value


Interesting that the n=1 component has the magnitude of roughly twice your dc average...

the autocorrelation should show the dc component clearly.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close