×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FACTS devices vs Power Factor

FACTS devices vs Power Factor

FACTS devices vs Power Factor

(OP)
Stable voltage and a decent power factor are both desired in a power system. FACTS devices only consider the stability of the voltage. Do FACTS devices not worsen the power factor of the power system while improving the voltage stability? How is power factor kept in a decent range while using the FACTS devices?

RE: FACTS devices vs Power Factor

FACTS devices are really expensive for power factor correction. Regular cap bank are like eight times cheaper on a $/kvar basis. Unless, you need small step sizes or full range, I don't know how you justify FACTS devices for just power factor correction. Even then, synchronous condensers are significantly cheaper than FACTS devices and provide many of the same benefits.

RE: FACTS devices vs Power Factor

But are not synchronous condensers more expensive to maintain? And do they not in fact have much higher operating losses?

CR

"As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another." [Proverbs 27:17, NIV]

RE: FACTS devices vs Power Factor

Not from what I have seen. GE was offering us a package were they maintained the synchronous condenser for 50-60k a year so we wouldn't have to do it and it still was much cheaper.

This 2006 paper puts synchronous condensers in the $10 - 40/kvar range and statcom in the $55-70 /kvar range. When SVCs and STATCOM are used for power factor correction, I believe the decision is made without respect to economics.



http://www.energycollection.us/Energy-Distribution...

RE: FACTS devices vs Power Factor

Do FACTS devices not worsen the power factor of the power system while improving the voltage stability? No
How is power factor kept in a decent range while using the FACTS devices? See the info below

RE: FACTS devices vs Power Factor

(OP)
Hey @hamburgerhelper, I am not justifiying their use for PF correction. I am just asking that we use FACTS to inject reactive power in the system for voltage support, Do we not result in a worse PF of the system?

Maybe my basic concept is weak. I am assuming that the more the reactive power in the system the worse is the power factor.

RE: FACTS devices vs Power Factor

You add capacitive KVARs to the system to raise the voltage. This first cancels the affect of any inductive KVARs in the line.
One problem with inductive KVARs is a reactive voltage drop. With capacitive KVARS, you have a reactive voltage rise.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources