Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.


True position of a hex center?

RE: True position of a hex center?

Position each of the three pairs of parallel faces to the axis or, preferably, use a profile tolerance to control the variation in form and location.

RE: True position of a hex center?

@3DDave thanks for your response! I have just one question though, is one method superior to the other in terms of cost saving? (i.e., is it easy for the machinists to do the profile?)

RE: True position of a hex center?

If the machinist is using a rotary broach, then it probably is. It depends on the machinist.

See for an example. There are other suppliers; Google search put this one at the top of my list.

Other than that, the callout is really so the inspector can verify that the part meets requirements and for the engineer to accurately record a solution to the problem. If the solution requires uniformity of shape and that shape needs to be located in some way, then profile is a correct choice.

RE: True position of a hex center?

Great, that clears up a lot thanks again Dave!

RE: True position of a hex center?

Another solution could be:
Directly toleranced size hex dimension, phantom maximum inscribed circle around the inside hex and position associated with it. Position could be at MMC to help functional gaging for assembleability.
True profile of the inside hex would be dimensioned with basic angles and basic corner radii.

I got this concept from another discussion where pmarc participated and I would like to know if can be applied here. All the credit ( if solution is acceptable) shall go to pmarc.

Of course the OP has to use 2009 versiun of ASME Y14.5 so the position callout can be applied to irregular features of size.

RE: True position of a hex center?

No one else is concerned that the 5/8 threads are the primary datum?

RE: True position of a hex center?

Well, if the thread is doing the job of orienting this part in the assembly, probably is a good choice to be a primary datum.
What else COULD orient this part? How this part physically interacts with its mating components in the assembly? Physical realities of this assembly.

RE: True position of a hex center?

Just was surprised that no one mentioned it. Every GD&T author that I have read says to never use threads as datums unless you absolutely have to. That sentence is usually followed up with one that says even if you have nothing else to choose from you should still consider not using them.

RE: True position of a hex center?

This solution would be the last I would use and recommend in this case, unless there is really a functional need to define something working along dynamic-profile-tolerance-zone lines. The reason I came up with this method was that in the 2009 version of the standard there is no tool that would work similarly to "dynamic tolerance zone" modifier (as proposed in the new draft of Y14.5). The tricky part of it is that hex contour is not fully defined with basic dimensions, and so many people may see this as a violation of the profile tolerance application rules. I personally think it is more like extension of principles (supported by the infamous figures from the standard where cones are controlled by combination of directly toleranced +/- diameter and profile tolerance).

With that said there are at least couple other ways to control hex features, and most likely at least one of them will grasp the design intent (some of them have been already mentioned):
1.Three position feature control frames applied to each pair of parallel faces and referencing to A. Tricky part of it: inspection will have to know that these position callouts apply simultaneously, so in fact the angles between center planes of pairs of faces are also indirectly controlled.
2. Simple all-around profile callout wrt A.
3. Composite all-around profile callout with upper segment referencing A (location control) and lower segment with or without A (size/form, or size/form/orientation control).
4. Combination of datumless all-around profile tolerance and position at MMC.
5. Combination of datumless all-around profile tolerance applied directly to hex contour and position at MMC wrt A applied to a phantom maximum inscribed circle.
6. A little bit more tricky application of combination of datumless all-around profile tolerance applied directly to hex contour and position at RFS wrt A applied to a phantom maximum inscribed circle.

RE: True position of a hex center?

These are all great answers guys, thanks!
All these make sense to me however I am relatively new to GD&T, how would you carry out number three? Would it be like in this picture?

And if it is like in the picture does it essentially mean that the bottom part provides a hexagonal shaped tolerance zone of 0.02 (constraining the actual profile of the hex) and then the top part provides a 0.05 tolerance zone (also hexagonal) in which that pattern must fit?

Thanks again!

RE: True position of a hex center?

Great post and discussion. Note: The distance across the flats needs to be BASIC.

Certified Sr. GD&T Professional

RE: True position of a hex center?

Regarding the use of threaded features as a datum - meh... they make Jo Plugs for a reason. There are occasions where a threaded feature is actually serving more functions than simply fastening, but I absolutely agree that it should be treated as exceptional.

You'd be hard pressed to prove your case if the thread in question was something like a 1/2-13 UNC-1A though...

RE: True position of a hex center?

The distance across flats indeed needs to be basic.

As for the datum threaded feature, from what I see on the original drawing datum axis is derived from thread major diameter, thus datum feature simulator is contractable cylindrer, not thread.

RE: True position of a hex center?

Sweet, thanks again everyone this was seriously helpful!

RE: True position of a hex center?

Thread-as-datum doesn't concern me much at all if it's on the major diameter.. that feature is easy to control well and easy to gage.

RE: True position of a hex center?

For /external/ threads, sure. Easy to control, easy to gage, and almost useless as a functional feature. So not a very smart choice in most applications.

RE: True position of a hex center?

But a perfectly functional one in certain instances, which is the point I was making.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close