INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Fatigue - Kt for a spotfaced hole

Fatigue - Kt for a spotfaced hole

(OP)
Hi folks.

I'm doing fatigue analysis for an open spotfaced hole. As a first approach I was looking the Peterson's Chart 3.1 "Stress concentration factors Kt for a stepped flat tension bar with shoulder fillets" taking "H" as 2 times my thickness but I'm not convinced due to "h" in the chart should be infinite (for my case).

Does anyone can suggest another kt approach and how to combine it to the kt=3 (open hole)?

Thanks.

RE: Fatigue - Kt for a spotfaced hole

the Kt for the spotface should be quite distant from the Kt for the hole.

"h" seems a relative innocent parameter ... only used to set the nominal stress (P/hd) ...

I'd look at how deep the spotface is compared to the thickness under the spotface, this'd be H/d.
and you should be able to get r/d.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Fatigue - Kt for a spotfaced hole

Time to switch to FEA I think.

Otherwise, Patterson has a calculation for plotting the stress concentration as a distance from the hole I recall, which will give you something better than 3 for the hole.

RE: Fatigue - Kt for a spotfaced hole

NACA TN2073 has the stress distribution due to a hole

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Fatigue - Kt for a spotfaced hole

Castorena...

I think the latest Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors [book] would have methods to calculate the Kt of spot-face + centered hole.

Regards, Wil Taylor

o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close