×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Inlet boundary condition for acoustic wave

## Inlet boundary condition for acoustic wave

(OP)
Dear all,

I want to simulate the propagation of an acoustic wave with a spherical wave source outside my computational domain using Finite Element Method. The governing equation is a linearized acoustic equation with velocity potential as the primary variable ( the secondary variable is thus velocity). In order to let the wave propagate into the domain, I might need to add an impedance condition on the boundary by setting the predicted fluid particle velocity on the boundary nodes (natural boundary condition). However, the discretization of FEM only allows the normal component of the velocity be prescribed on the boundary (divergence theorem).

My question is:
Is it physical to enforce only normal component of fluid particle velocity on the boundary?
Would it decrease the wave magnitude or distort the wave?
If so, is there any way to circumvent that?

Thank you all very much for your attention.

### RE: Inlet boundary condition for acoustic wave

Both Longitudinal and Transverse waves exists, but the for liquids and gases, the transverse wave impart little force to the solid boundary, and resulting in reflection of the wave. The longitudinal waves exert pressure and momentum forces on the surface as your FEA package descibes.

### RE: Inlet boundary condition for acoustic wave

(OP)
Thanks for your reply, hacksaw. I might not make my question clear. The boundary mentioned in the question is actually the outer boundary of the fluid. By adding an impedance boundary condition on that boundary, the wave could pass from the infinite acoustic domain into the computational domain. I already assume that it is a longitudinal wave in that the fluid particle displacement is in the direction of wave propagation.

### RE: Inlet boundary condition for acoustic wave

That's how I see it, transverse "acoustic", longitudinal "pressure" waves. The transverse is only significant if the material is characterized by an elastic behavior in the transverse.

### RE: Inlet boundary condition for acoustic wave

In ANSYS, you could define a monopole outside of the computation domain. Here's an example. The help document says it applies incident pressure to the exterior boundary (link).

Best regards,
Sze Kwan (Jason) Cheah

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!