Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?
Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?
(OP)
Good Morning!
I am working on an existing structural steel framed building that has been is service for about 25 years. Since the owners are adding some heavier roof mounted AHUs, I asked that the affected existing girder to column connections (welded to column, bolted to beam web) be exposed and inspected to verify condition and bolt configuration versus the original design drawings.
These bolted connections were originally designed as A325 bearing, snug tight.
At 2 locations, the inspector found 1/8" to 3/16" gaps between the connection angle and the bolted girder web, with loose washers. (at one location the nuts had been tack welded). It appears they were never brought up tight during erection.
I don't believe trying to re-tighten them is an option; the girder is under heavy load, and I don't think you can re-tighten A325s.
Does anybody know of an acceptance criteria for this kind of condition, or how to determine if the capcity is actually decreased?
Thanks!
I am working on an existing structural steel framed building that has been is service for about 25 years. Since the owners are adding some heavier roof mounted AHUs, I asked that the affected existing girder to column connections (welded to column, bolted to beam web) be exposed and inspected to verify condition and bolt configuration versus the original design drawings.
These bolted connections were originally designed as A325 bearing, snug tight.
At 2 locations, the inspector found 1/8" to 3/16" gaps between the connection angle and the bolted girder web, with loose washers. (at one location the nuts had been tack welded). It appears they were never brought up tight during erection.
I don't believe trying to re-tighten them is an option; the girder is under heavy load, and I don't think you can re-tighten A325s.
Does anybody know of an acceptance criteria for this kind of condition, or how to determine if the capcity is actually decreased?
Thanks!






RE: Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?
RE: Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?
RE: Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?
canwesteng, I think you are correct that if the bolt is in good condition it can be re-used once.
Motorcity, the connection is OK by my load calc. I doubt it could be brought snug due to loading.
I'm inclined to leave it; I don't know that adding shims would actually do anything since already under load.
Asking in case there is some criteria that I'm not finding about this.
RE: Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?
and see what they might have to say.
Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Structural Steel Bolted Connections - in place acceptance criteria?