INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

length development for hook dowels vs. punching shear for footing thickness

length development for hook dowels vs. punching shear for footing thickness

length development for hook dowels vs. punching shear for footing thickness

(OP)

I just noticed that the footing thickness required for length development for hook in tension is sometimes so much higher than the required thickness based from punching shear.

Is this really reasonable?

PCA Notes example problem shows that we need to consider length development in tension when the footing is subjected to horizontal force, checking the shear (transfer) friction between the top of the footing and the base of the column resulting dowels under tension.

But I realized that is not the only case. When the column is also subjected to bending, column main bars (or dowels) are also in tension.

Any thoughts?

RE: length development for hook dowels vs. punching shear for footing thickness

Yes, sometimes footing thickness is controlled by the requirements for dowel development.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: length development for hook dowels vs. punching shear for footing thickness

YOu can use a longer hook length with a reduced thickness of footing for tension... not for compression development... hooks are non effective.

Dik

RE: length development for hook dowels vs. punching shear for footing thickness

I disagree with dik. Simply extending the horizontal length of a bar beyond the bend in the hook does not increase development--it does not meet Code.

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close