×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AASHTO pedestrian rail loading
2

AASHTO pedestrian rail loading

AASHTO pedestrian rail loading

(OP)
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm reviewing some calcs for a pedestrian rail on the top of a retaining wall, and I wanted to see how others interpret AASHTO's Live Loads (see the attached scan).

Specifically, I'm looking at the connection of the rail to the CIP coping at the top of the MSE wall. So to get the design moment, I was going to use the post design. The text (highlighted) seems to imply that you only need to provide a single concentrated load at the top of the post, but the figures they provide below show loads at each longitudinal member. The designer whose work I'm checking used the 0.2+0.05*L load at the top, but also put .2 on the lower members. This seems wrong to me - if anything, I would have thought they'd use the 0.05*L since the figure calls that load "w".

I appreciate any comments! Thanks in advance!
-Jdarr02

RE: AASHTO pedestrian rail loading

The language on this topic seems vague, but it seems like the longitudinal elements should be designed for 50 plf in any direction + 200 lb point load at any point in any direction, and the post should be designed for that load at the elevation of top longitudinal element or at 5', whichever is less. To do otherwise would suggest that the loading on the post is a function of the number of longitudinal elements, which doesn't seem to make sense.

RE: AASHTO pedestrian rail loading

dnlv's assessment is correct. Post loads are independent of rail loads. Sometimes AASHTO is vague for two reasons: 1) they don't have an answer; 2) you're supposed to know this is how we've always done it.ponder

RE: AASHTO pedestrian rail loading

(OP)
Thanks for confirming my suspicions guys! I agree, too. thumbsup2

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources