Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Helpful Member!  ZoranB (Structural) (OP)
10 Jan 01 0:17
I have some doubts concerning load combining in ACI.

From ACI318 and its comment it is not quite clear are the following combinations possible:

0.9 x D + 1.7 x L
(when dead load reduces effects of live load)

1.4 x D + 1.7 x L1 + 0.0 x L2
(it seems reasnoble that if there are several live loads, some of them could have favourable character)

0.75 x (1.4 x D + 1.7 x W)
(combination with wind load, but with zero live load)

0.9 x D + ??? x L + 1.3 x W
(dead load has a favourable character so it is taken with reduced factor. Why is wind factor 1.3 and not 1.28. Can live load "join" this combination and with which factor ???).

0.9 x D + 1.4 x F + 1.7 x L
(F - fluid pressure)

Could fluid load (F), inpact load (I), effects from differential settlement (T) be taken into seismic combination (wind load couldn't)? If could, what will be the right treatment for fluid load or T - load?

I also checked SAP2000 manual. It considers only small part of all possible combinations. Why is that?

thanks in advance
Zoran
Helpful Member!  HochwaltPE (Structural)
30 Jan 01 9:05
I'll try to answer a couple of these:

0.9 x D + ??? x L + 1.3 x W

If the live load has a favorable character, it should not be included. If the live load has an unfavorable character, I would use a load factor of 1.3. (or 1.28 if you prefer.)

The 1.3 factor is just a simplification of 0.75*1.7. (Remember - these combinations preceded the widespread use of computers.)

0.9 x D + 1.4 x F + 1.7 x L

The code would not require that fluid load or differential settlement be considered simultaneously with seismic effects. Generally, I would feel like the probability of all those effects occurring simultaneously to be extremely low, and not worth considering. In your particular structure, however, you may feel that there is a real chance of them occurring concurrently. If so, you should develop your own load case.

John M. Hochwalt, PE

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close