×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
I am designing grade beams sitting on a soil with 1500 psf allowable bearing capacity for total load. The beams are bearing directly on the soil and are NOT supported by drilled piers or spread footings. The total length of the beam runs 64'-8" LF. I have 34'-8" LF of the grade beam supporting a 13'-4" tall CMU wall, a trib. width of 10'-8" carrying DL =25 psf & LL=20 psf. I have attached a plan view of the foundation layout: http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=8... . Currently I am designing it as a simply supported beam, but I am getting that the beam is failing as a 12x24 grade beam with (3) #6 bars. I have been only been able to get it to work using 18x36 w/ (4) #8, 18x36 w/ (5) #7, and 12x36 w/(4) #7. How should I go about designing the grade beam? Do I design it as a simply supported beam? Any suggestions and/or comments are appreciated.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

Isn't what you're describing the same as a strip footing?

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

why is the grade beam designed as simply supported at ends when it's uniformly supported by the soil?

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@Shotzie - Well, I guess it acts like a strip footing but it is not that wide, only 12". Wouldn't the reinforcement be different? Right now the grade beams have stirrups in them but a wall footing would not, right?

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@delagina - When I researched the design of grade beam i found to design the like a regular beam. I believe in those cases it is when they are sitting on the soil but have either a drilled pier or spread footing underneath them.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

The width of a grade beam/strip footing has an impact on the allowable bearing stress as well as settlement... any geotechnical support? Early stone rubble foundation walls often had no 'footing' under them.

Dik

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

What span length are you using if there's no piers or footings? That should flick the light on that you're analyzing it incorrectly.

With the applied loading you have (roughly 1400 plf assuming partially grouted masonry) there's not much capacity left for a reasonably sized grade beam that's only 12" wide.

As for the reinforcing in the grade beam, in your case it's more like a footing than anything. You can put T&B bars and stirrups if you want. It makes sense to be sure it has some spanning capability in case there are any soft spots below areas.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@dik- When you say geotechnical support do you mean if there is select fill underneath the grade beam? I don't follow.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@Shotzie & @jayrod12 - When checking it as a continuous spread footing I run into an issue with the shear check due to the width. My C=(b(width of the footing)-t (thickness of the wall))/2 - d, C=(b-t)/2 -d, is becoming a negative length number.I don't think I should continue the calculation if I have a negative number for the critical section for shear.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

This is going to sound quite rude,

IT"S FULLY SUPPORTED AT THE BASE! There's minimal moment or shear applied to the grade beam.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@jayrod12 - I appreciate all comments that are helpful, so I am not offended. So how would I design the grade beam? What is the best approach to analyze the detail that i have previously posted. I was taught many years ago to treat it like a simply supported beam and use the drilled piers/ spread footings as a pined condition. After seeing the grade beam detail , how should I determine it is able to handle the loads I mentioned at the beginning on my post?

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

size it to provide enough bearing width you don't exceed the bearing capacity of the soil below.

Design the reinforcing to span some extent of soft bearing material. How far you choose to design it to span is up to you, but something like 5-10ft is like more than adequate. If your grade beam has to span further than that over a soft spot, you're going to exceed your bearing capacity beyond the soft area.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@jayrod12 - Thank you for the help.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

back to your original idea, if you assume it as simply supported "grade beam", where do you think the concentrated reaction at the ends of the beam will go if you don't have drilled pier or spread footing?

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@delagina - I was using the junctions where the grade beams intersect as the ends of the beams where the concentrated loads go

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

But then where would it go from there? Somehow, somewhere, the load needs to get into the soil. and concentrating it would require spread footings at those places.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@jayrod12 & @delagina - Yes, be that as it may, I needed some length to use. I would have the same issue for any length I arbitrarily used (even if I just check a 1 ft section/strip). This is why I asked for clarification on the matter. I am new to this type of work. I did something similar awhile back but it has been many years. I appreciate both of your input.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

Are you by any chance an engineer? I don't think so, if you are asking this sort of question. This site is for engineers.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

The Wire Reinforcement Institute has an free empirically based design document for slabs on grade. It was originally published in 1981 and then updated in mid 90's.

All you really need are a few soil parameters and the climate zone to design a slab. If you follow their procedure and charts, it will give you a required steel area for your beams.

We use it at our firm for generator pads and other low-risk type slabs. You can design an entire slab in under 30 minutes with it after some practice.

Here is the design document: TF 700-R-07 (WRI/CRSI 81): Design of Slab-on-Ground Foundation

They have a design example in the back of their Design Manual that you can follow.

Google Wire Reinforcement Institute.org

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

(OP)
@JoelTXCive - Thank you, I appreciate the information.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

This thread is a crime scene thumbsup

oengineer - what if you dropped the notion of beam, and replaced it with 'ground lump of concrete'. Then you'll see that it is just in fact a lump of concrete sitting on the ground. Your only job then it to try make it not sink in to the ground too much so it doesn't ruin those 7 toilets sat right next to it. That won't end well for anyone!

For what it's worth I'd still prefer a wider footing. But those residential construction codes that spec ground beams are tried and true, and I think mainly they are used because they don't typically have geotechnical reports or competent people to compact the ground, so they span over 'soft spots'. Be careful though, the ones I've read have a typical scope of max 2 stories. If you're supporting a concrete slab and roof, you may have to come up with an 'engineered solution' as they say in the residential code.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

@OP:
Do you have any geotechnical consultant involved to properly determine the bearing capacity and possible settlement. If he's happy with it... loads are small and soil is good, then no issues.

Dik

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

The way to determine the moment in the beam is quite simple. You can set up the beam as a simple span beam, with a support at each end. You then apply the loads and assume that there is a uniform load acting in the opposite direction (this is the support from the soil). You then solve for this uniform load so that the reactions at the end of the beam are equal to 0. Once you know what the uniform load is, you can draw a shear and moment diagram from the forces on the beam and then design the beam for the maximum forces.

You should find that the forces will be minimal.

RE: Design of Grade Beam Foundation without Drilled piers or spread footings underneath

Sorry, Nope. Wall/strip footing. Check allowable bearing/width of footing. Use code minimums allowable for your site soils if you are qualified to know this and you have no geotech on board. Call the building department for advice on site soils if no geotech. Is it a commercial job? If so, why no geotech? Was it a prepared pad by for a development, there must be something you can hang your assumptions on.

Bearing on sound/native material over excavated if necessary to sound material and backfilled with LSM (or compacted fill only if compaction verified by that guy/geotech). Install minimum footing reinforcement (top and bottom) per code (ACI code)assuming you own one. Verify frost depth if applicable which may/may not get you to sound bearing.

If the soil is that bad or concerns you for some reason, you'd better get a geotech involved, they are nice people dispute what you might think and their questionable public reputation. Might have something to do with having dirty fingernails. Apologies, I digress, anyway, if the soil is that bad, better start thinking post tension slab with your 12" wide wall footing. Anyway, It's a wall footing, turned down, or independent, it's a wall footing uniformly support by soil/springs. Not a believer,....you can model it if you wish. You will be modeling a concrete sandwich. I suspect the only reinforcing requirement will be governed by material steel/concrete minimum reinforcement ratios. But practice will say reinforcing bars at top and bottom to cover the soft spots and negative bending. Depths and width's of some footings will exceed building code minimums with regards to minimum reinforcing required to be there, not material code minimums where min. steel/conc. ratios will govern. Building code minimums are not designs. Never have been. oengineer,...hope you've got a sense of humor,...I can get a little slap happy! Good luck! and,....."Wall footing". I'm hungry, going to lunch with a Geotech.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources