×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

(OP)
i design pipebridge (not an actual bridge see pic attached) from time to time and in all cases i had to use wide flange beam for bottom and top chord because of bending.

i'm confused because i see these sign supports all the time in freeway some even around 100' and angles are working fine.

can someone link me the analysis of these supports. are the bottom and top chord assumed as axial only because i cant see these angles passing if it were to take bending.



RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

(OP)
pic of pipe bridge that i design


RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

(OP)
nevermind i should have googled first.. i see some pdf online re overhead sign support design.. i'll just compare it with how i design my top and bottom chord.. i usually analyze it as one long beam with shear connection at the ends..

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

The sign gantry in your photo has trusses both vertically and horizontally. So the members are not typically designed for bending. But that one does look skinny. I don't know how it works for loading transverse to the roadway.

I like your pipebridge much better.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

NYSDOT has standard sign structure designs, based on sign area, span, and height Link. You can use these as a sanity check. I'm sure other DOT's have similar tables.

The only sign structures we design in NY are ones carrying VMS. They're quite heavy at times and the size of the sign is specific to the location. These are quad trusses, which we design as a space truss. The truss is simply supported. The members are always round sections. I attached the NYSDZOT sign structure design manual for reference. I'll also post the VMS design manual.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

(OP)
FYI I didn't design the attached pipebridge pic. It was a pic I saw online. I have designed numerous pipebridge similar to that though and I ALWAyS have wide flange as bottom and top chord. Not sure how a 100' sign support pass with just angles as top and bottom chord.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

I've never seen a long span (or for that matter a short span) sign structure with angles as top & bottom truss chords. Always tubes, round, rectangular, or square.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

We re-purposed an old highway sign that was salvaged when a road was widened or something. It was re-used as traffic guidance for entering and leaving a driveway on a motor speedway. The span we used was about 70' after modifying the truss. I believe it was over 100' originally.

Anyway, the whole thing was built from angles. 6x6x1/2" for the (4) chords and 3x3x3/8" for the diagonals. It was 4'-5" wide and 5'-9" deep.

Link

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

(OP)
So how do you analyze this using 3D software.
I model mine as one continuous beam for top and bottom chord, shear connected at the column. Vertical and horizontal brace as truss member.

Is there another way of analysis for this truss? Can this be analyze as one built up shape basically just one member?

I haven't read the PDF I downloaded. I'm curious how those angle top and bottom chord are passing.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

I guess I don't understand why the sign guys stay away from angles. I just designed a long pipe rack and while I didn't use angles for the chords, I used WT's, which seem pretty similar.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Quote (I don't understand why the sign guys stay away from angles)


My guess, in no particular order:

Aesthetics;
No horizontal projections to accumulate snow, debris or provide a home for pigeons;
More torsional rigidity with a tube versus angle;and
That's what the DOT tells us to use

From a fabrication standpoint gusset plates with angles is easier.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

I prefer this kind.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Look over ASCE 10 for some hints on how angles are used in Transmission towers. There are specialty software programs like PLS-CADD, but the design is mainly done as a 3D truss with some adjustments in the compression allowable for concentric connections and end restraint. My last big design was a free standing river crossing structure that was 332'-0 tall made from all angles to withstand a 120 mph hurricane. The unique aspect of our industry is that we do full scale testing of towers to destruction to see if we know what we are doing. You can afford to destroy one for proof of concept when you are going to build 1000 copies over the next 20 years. We even have our own ASTM A394 bolts to keep the threads out of the shear plane.

The telecom industry does use round solid or pipe type legs with welded gusset plates on their 3 sided free standing towers. They do sometimes use 60° angles as legs.

_____________________________________
I have been called "A storehouse of worthless information" many times.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

I've used the pipe kinds for a low clearance warning. I "borrowed" a lot from our state DOT. I think the verticals were Schedule 160 12 inch pipe. I couldn't really justify them, structurally (they were under stressed), but I still used them and never looked back.
And it's still there to this day.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

hokie,

I'll see your monotube and raise you 3 monotubes. This one's about 15 miles from my house. It was erected about 12 years ago and one of the first uses of a monotube sign structure in the region.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

The monotube supports are very popular here in Australia. Not sure I deserve it, but I take credit for introducing them to Queensland. In the design of a freeway project here, the authority involved an architect for some reason. Anyway, he came to us for advice on the overhead signage, and thought my suggestion of these looked clean. They do. That was about 25 years ago, and the rolled tube type are prevalent here now.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

(OP)
nobody still answered how angle chords should be modeled in 3d software. should it be modeled as continuous beam, shear connection at the ends?

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Just axial members, a traditional truss.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Monotubes were manufactured by our company for federally funded interstate construction jobs in Ct.. The beauty about monotubes is that they were relatively easy to manufacture and paint. To bend the sections, a subcontract was invoked but we did the welding.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Did you paint them? All the ones I have done have been hot dipped.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Quote (Delagina)

Can this be analyze as one built up shape basically just one member?

Yes. That's essentaially what a truss model is, with some shear flexibility thrown in, right?

Quote (Delagina)

should it be modeled as continuous beam, shear connection at the ends?

That is what I would do for physically continuous chords. Hopefully the shear stiffness of the truss is high enough that it wouldn't matter much either way.

I believe that sign structures are allowed to be designed rather aggressively with regard to their flexibility. Perhaps that accounts for some of the difference. Locally, we've had some issues with resonant vibration.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

Amazing that folks continued to drive under that dancing sign. And then, one fell off. Looks like they used a lighter section for the horizontal than for the vertical. The advantage for this type support is that, as chicopee said, they are simple to make, and they are also simple to erect. But it is not wise to skimp on the size of tube selected. I hadn't previously considered resonance as a problem, similar to what has been experienced with footbridges.

RE: overhead sign support angle top and bottom chord

It seems to have been a one off affair. We've got zillions of the things and the rest have been performing admirably to my knowledge.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources