×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

1920's era concrete joist designation

1920's era concrete joist designation

1920's era concrete joist designation

(OP)
I have an existing 1920s building where the floor framing appears to be concrete pan joists and the designation on the drawings is 12" TILE - 2-1/2" SLAB...Is anybody familiar with that? Is that saying the total depth is 12"? Was there a standard width for these I couldn't find it on the drawings. See the attached image for a partial plan view hopefully it came through, Thanks in advance.


RE: 1920's era concrete joist designation

I did not have the time to examine the attachment, but an familiar with that type of floor construction (historic and current) for the U.S. and foreign. The "flat terracotta arch" term seems to describe what I have seen.

I had a unique home in Minnesota built in 1917 and the exterior walls consisted of actual 10" clay tile (cores horizontal) as the structural portion that had a stucco exterior and the interior consisted of full (not nominal) 2x4s, lath and plaster with a "China coat". During some modifications, I measured the 10" clay tile and the dimensions were actual and not modular. Since then, most dimensions of the similar units were converted over time to nominal.

There are many floor systems(floor filler systems) in use in many countries today with both concrete block or clay block used as fillers between the cast in place beams and/or precast beams and the thickness of the topping varied to provide a level finished floor surface.

The filler systems are still used in some countries (Eastern Europe) even for roofs with a slope. The precast beams carrying the fillers and the topping are a standard product and the topping varies depending on the finished surface requirements.

When I looked at the drawings provided on this site, It appeared that the height controls were dictated by the long span and the topping thickness varied depending on the elevation of the "beam" seats. - just a guess.

Dick

Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design.

RE: 1920's era concrete joist designation

This is not an arch system - it is exactly what stevenspm states - using tile as a stay-in-place form.

The 12 inches is the vertical depth from the bottom of the concrete joist web up to the bottom of the slab. Then you have 2 1/2" of slab for a total joist height of 14 1/2".

It appears from the plan you provided that each rib has (2) two 7/8" or 3/4" diameter round rods as bottom reinforcement spaced at 16" o.c. This implies that the ribs formed by the gaps in the tile forms are 16" o.c. I don't see where the rib width is provided but you could probably very easily verify that at the building. There might also be other notes or typical joist details that might indicate the horizontal layout of the joists.

Just as a side note - the usual challenge with these joists are the shear capacities - usually they were not supplied with any stirrups or ladder bars to provide Vs to supplement Vc. So you are stuck with Vc only and it seems that engineers prior to the 1950's didn't really have a good grasp of shear capacity.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: 1920's era concrete joist designation

JAE & stevenspm have convinced me this is not "Terra Cotta Arches", but a "One-Way Combination Floor" per JAE's description:



For these floors, tile width seems to have been standardized at 12". Various heights were available, including both 8" and 12". Common concrete joist widths (between each tile) were 4", 5" and 6". A 4" joist would put the rebar at 16" O.C., as specified. The callout of 2 rebar is a puzzle... perhaps they were spaced vertically in the joist.

This is my concept of the detail, see pages 367 through 371 of the 1934 Carnegie Pocket Companion for background info:

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: 1920's era concrete joist designation

Tile were a very common form of construction in the first half of the 20th century; commercial, institutional and high-end residential buildings frequently used them. Aside from specific companies (lots of info available on the web) you can get generic info from Ramsey & Sleeper's Architectural Graphic Standards, even the 6th edition in the 1960s.

RE: 1920's era concrete joist designation

Would the 2 bars perhaps be one bottom, one top? I think this will require some minor destructive investigation to find out exactly what is there.

RE: 1920's era concrete joist designation

I've seen both, hokie66. Usually there was a straight bar and a bent (truss or crank) bar side by side at midspan. In SRE's sketch they are shown one above the other and there's no mention of "crank" bars on the plans.

Your suggestion of minor destructive investigation is appropriate if the more conservative assumption doesn't work after trying first. A small chipping hammer on a couple of joists near midspan would reveal what's there.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources