×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
We are working on a multilevel residential basements project. In one area, the basement is roughly two stores deep with 12.5' story heights. We currently have the intermediate level as metal deck with steel beams.

We are running into some problems residing the retaining pressures with the metal deck. Our initial thought was to try and resolve it as a subdiaphragm similar to tiltup construction but we are having issues with the diaphragm shears.

I've discussed using the deck as a compression mber with verco but they weren't entirely helpful and didn't have any testing to back it up. They suggested using only the topping slab (even when parallel to flutes)

How have you been able to make an intermediate basement level work with metal deck? Or is concrete slab really the only feasible option?

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

A lot of factors do tend to favour concrete. Can you post a quick plan sketch showing the basics of slopes, framing, and elevation changes? I'd be looking to utilize the topping slab as well rather than relying on the steel deck at all. How does the topping slab fail?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Based on what you're saying, I think a metal deck system is probably a poor choice. Forgetting vibration and sound problems, it means your deck is spanning maybe 4 or 5 feet, and then you have steel beams (not joists?) at a pretty tight spacing (i.e., lots of beams). Adding concrete means the beam spacing can be 8 feet or more (fewer beams).

But if your hand is forced with metal deck, I would ignore it as a diaphragm and design steel beams as axial struts to take the soil pressure. You'll need them in both directions and to design the wall to span horizontally between beam pockets at the upper basement line. I'd use slip-critical bolts to provide axial connections, as opposed to welding.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
Thanks guy for initial input. See attached for basement configuration. Don't scrutinize sizes too much as a lot of this needs to be refined heavily.

The lowest level is a relatively small squash court (page 1 of PDF)
Next is a mezzanine level that is a combination of open space for the squash court and matslab (page 2 of the pdf)
Next level is upper basement which is the level in question that currently has metal deck with concrete fill over the mezzanine portion. The rest of the level is matslab (page 3 of the pdf)
Walls below and above right now are overlaid (may be helpful or may be confusing)

We are finding that the resultant earth pressure at the upper basement level is pretty high.
Initially, we were hoping to frame the level with steel beams and concrete pandeck but not sure how to resolve the forces into the concrete pandeck. The rest of the structure has W2 deck with 2.5" topping above. Ideally, we would use that at this level as well.

One thought I had was:

North / South Direction -- Hoping to brace the excavation with the perpendicular steel framing
East Direction -- Hoping to brace the reaction with the adjacent matslab.
West Direction -- This is where I am running into some problems. The reaction is high as the wall is pretty tall due to open squash court level. I believe the reaction from the soil earth pressure was in the magnitude of 10k/ft. We are planning on running perpendicular beams which are not currently shown. The hope was to run them only over the squash court and then we would have developed our "sub diaphragm". With the reactions we have, I' having a bit of trouble getting this to work out.

Another thought I had was to design the concrete topping slab as a compression element which has unbraced length of the beam spacing. I don't love the idea, but at least we are in the strong direction of the deck here.

We can also evaluate spanning the wall horizontally to the return walls (although there is currently a jog in the wall). We could also potentially use tiebacks or other external bracing mechanisms if we absolutely have to.

If all else fails, we can replace the metal deck and steel beams with a elevated concrete slab. This seems to handle the retaining pressures better, but the contractor would prefer pandeck if possible.

Any thoughts? Sorry, I know I probably have not explained well.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Quote (jd)

Another thought I had was to design the concrete topping slab as a compression element which has unbraced length of the beam spacing. I don't love the idea, but at least we are in the strong direction of the deck here.

I do love this. It's only about 0.3 ksi. I've seen this done for main floor slabs on several occasions. I thought that you were dealing with parking or a system that would entail significant vertical stepping across the floor deck. With no stepping you can push the load right through to the other side of the floor and into the opposing soil.

I see no need for it but, as yet another options, I've cast an exterior site girt into foundation walls before. Kinda depends on what you've got going on for shoring/back fill. Contractors dislike it of course.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
Thanks KootK. I am a bit nervous using only the 2.5" topping for compression, loading but seems you would be comfortable with it? I was initially thinking, I'd go with at least 4" if I were to utilize this method. Space is tight, architect would very much prefer the thinner slab. We are planning on reinforcing with #3 bars @ 12" oc each way in the topping slab.

We could also redundantly add in cross beams at 1/3 or 1/4 points running across the length to form a grid. These would essentially be blocking between beams. I think we may have difficulty with the connections in compression for these beams unless we put in a pretty beefy assembly. I think I'd run these in at least 2-3 bays just because it feels right regardless, but could possibly run all the way across.

Quote (KootK)

I see no need for it but, as yet another options, I've cast an exterior site girt into foundation walls before. Kinda depends on what you've got going on for shoring/back fill. Contractors dislike it of course.

We actually have these on the other side but to help serve as shearwalls for a discontinuous moment frame.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Quote (jd)

I am a bit nervous using only the 2.5" topping for compression, loading but seems you would be comfortable with it?

Yeah, I would. Obviously not as comfortable as I'd bee with an 8" CIP slab but, then, engineering is a game of good enough, not ideal. I may be more comfortable with this because I stared up at a version of this five times a week for a period of several years. It was the way that the main floor was framed at a below grade fitness facility that I used to frequent. Straight into the deck, no perpendicular beams or stiffeners at all.

At first it did freak me out simply because, at the time, I'd never before encountered the system. Over the course of thousands of burpees and steinborn lifts, I gradually convinced myself that there were solutions to all of the failure modes that I was envisioning. The toughest, for me, was upwards slab buckling. The system that I was looking at had no shear studs. The only uplift connection would have been the deck deformations and the deck welds to the steel framing. I did some ball park number crunching and came to the conclusion that it would be pretty darn tough for the slab to buckle against gravity.

The sketch below shows what I'd fantasize about doing if it were my baby. I like the dowels and bay of solid slab as a means of keeping things sturdy until we're sure that the force is well distributed. Probably overkill. Solid slab soffit could be plywood or 0.6" form deck at the contractor's option.



I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
Thanks KootK. Makes sense.

Has anyone actually designed this condition before? Anything to be especially cautious of?

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

I have used formulas from the book 'formulas for stress,strain, and structural matrices' to determine the in-plane capacity of a slab, but don't recall specifics too much, and it wasn't a slab on metal deck. here is a shot of the formulation:


Roarks may have something similar.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

I did a crazy house with a wide-open single-level basement, but not a skip-level like you've got. My takeway was I'd rather not mess around with earth pressure.

You are doing what looks like a very high-end residence. I have been taught to treat these more carefully than commercial jobs, although few builders agree. I prefer to shave structural cost tight where the loads are not realistic/sustained loads (live/wind, etc). For actual felt loads such as earth pressure, I like a little redundancy to mitigate risk. I was also taught to tolerate far less vibration or live load deflection.

In your situation, I would build in redundancy by going this route:
-Reinf the wall to span horizontally. If the wall jogs, lap some zees.
--Use concrete topping 2.5" over 2"
--Do "blocking" beams in the first deck span
--Pretension all bolts in your grade-level steel diaphragm. Much debate here but in my opinion this "locks" your steel grid axially.
--Look at it as 18" cantilevered wall. Coming off a 30" footing with return walls, I think you have this load path too.
--Double-check your column sizes etc and see if you can reduce steel or get a column to fit the stud wall above grade. Throw the architect this bone when you insist on concrete topping.
--If you're really pressed on cost, I think your basement wall thickness can be varied for different walls. 18" is beefy.

Good luck. Very interesting dilemma thanks for posting


RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
Thanks for the plate references structSU10, I'll try and dig into something like that.

Appreciate all the input calvinandhobbes10. Seems like we are more or less on the same thought process. I was planning on implementing essentially all of the items you are mentioning.

We are still running through our columns sizes. We gave the architect an 8x8 as a placeholder to be refined later. Basement walls at 18" are also just a placeholder for the most part. Single story walls will likely be 12", I think the multistory walls we will likely keep at 18".

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

- more than I think is necessary.
- less than it sounds like you're planing.
- crazy stiff and robust.
- makes sense with construction sequencing.
- poor quality sketch. Friday = mucho scotch.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
KootK I feel like eng tips needs to have a credit card feature built in. You definitely need some payment for all your thoughts on people's posts.

When our wives respectively leave us for spending too much time on eng tips I hope we can cuddle up under a Canadian fire someplace.

Thanks for the thoughts. I think it's a good idea and worth exploring.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Quote (KootK)

Friday = mucho scotch.

Quote (jdgengineer)

...I hope we can cuddle up under a Canadian fire someplace.


I must resist replying...smile



RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Hey, if it sweetens the deal, I've got not one but two adult sized onesies to choose from. Cookie Monster and Voyageur. JD best get his snugly self up here quick though. Work on the Great Wall in the North could start any time.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)

Quote (kootk)

Hey, if it sweetens the deal, I've got not one but two adult sized onesies to choose from. Cookie Monster and Voyageur. JD best get his snugly self up here quick though. Work on the Great Wall in the North could start any time.

Just have to pack my Structural Dynamics book by Anil Chopra for some cozy fireside reading!

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
So we've run some calcs on the slab in compression assuming it's unbraced length is the spacing between beams. Parallel to the beams it's about 22' until we hit the perpendicular girder.

We've created a RISA 3D model to analyze the slab for P-Delta considering the gravity loading on the slab combined with axial compression force. RISA 3D is calculating the capacity of the slab following the slender column provisions of ACI 318.

Based on this analysis, we are now looking at a 6" C.I.P slab over the steel beams and omitting the metal deck to save height (architect is pushing very hard on ceiling height). The slab would obviously need to be shored in this instance. We are still planning on designing the beams as composite beams.

I haven't designed a composite beam floor without metal deck. Any out of the ordinary things to be concerned about? Obviously the contractor will not be thrilled with the shoring. Im hesitant to go all poured in place as we have some very large columns landing on steel beams right now and I'm not sure what the concrete beam solution would look like.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Quote (jd)

Any out of the ordinary things to be concerned about?

I've never actually done it but, analytically, the design actually seems simpler.

Do you know if erection safety issues will still require that the studs be field installed? Given the limited number of studs that will be involved, it would be nice if you could avoid the mob/demob costs of the stud welding on site.

I also imagine that you'll want some top steel over the beams.

Why is it necessary to eliminate the metal deck? I'd think that introducing a deck into the depth of your 6" slab would hardly impact axial capacity at all.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)

Quote (kootk)

Why is it necessary to eliminate the metal deck? I'd think that introducing a deck into the depth of your 6" slab would hardly impact axial capacity at all.

With W2 deck it would be difference of 4" topping slab vs 6" concrete? If we design considering slenderness effects of ACI as mentioned above it makes a difference. Obviously depends on what your definition of unbraced length is. We are considering it to be perpendicular beam spacing which is likely pretty conservative.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Fair enough. 6" solid slab it is!

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

I would add one more beam, respace, get your unbraced length down so the slab on deck checks. I think your slab axial load is conservative because you have the horizontal wall span anyway. My 2 cents

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)
Hi calvinandhobbes10 -- Thanks, we were actually just looking at that. I agree, it's a good thing to look into.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

I have to ask for my own edification: why not the solution that I posted Friday night? Back to normal deck, no columns on the CIP, and really convincing wall bracing.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

(OP)

Quote (Kootk)

I have to ask for my own edification: why not the solution that I posted Friday night? Back to normal deck, no columns on the CIP, and really convincing wall bracing.
I believe the shear forces in the horizontal concrete beam were too high to make it work. With 10k/ft x ~ 30' we have roughly 150k in reaction. Also, in looking at the wall in the other direction we are parallel to the beam framing, but if we tried to transfer all the force through the beams at 8'-0" we would have a reaction of roughly 80k into each beam. Obviously the direct connection of the deck helps transfer the compression force, but if we looked at only transferring it through the beam the reaction felt to high for beam pocket.

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

Did you not come off a distance d?

RE: Metal Deck over steel best intermediate basement level

So I kinda feel that all roads are really leading us back to a typical concrete slab here. The 6" flat slab on steel is really just a permutation of that. So... perhaps that simply is the right answer then. Regardless, the power of pedantry compels me...

Quote (jd)

believe the shear forces in the horizontal concrete beam were too high to make it work. With 10k/ft x ~ 30' we have roughly 150k in reaction.

You'd be over using just the concrete shear capacity but, unless I miss my mark, a very light reinforcing ratio in the slab would get the job done.

Quote (jd)

Obviously the direct connection of the deck helps transfer the compression force, but if we looked at only transferring it through the beam the reaction felt to high for beam pocket.

I've been noodling hard on this aspect of things. Given the reality of concrete shrinkage and creep, I don't think that there's any way around having the axial load wind up primarily in the steel beams. The only question, in my mind, is does the load start off in the steel beams or does it travel through the concrete for a short distance before making its way down?

You may have already come to this conclusion by the sound of it. Regardless, I feel as though this means that there isn't really a need for the deck selection choice to be dictated by the axial load condition in the parallel to beam condition. No matter how robust you make the slab, it's just going to be shedding its load to the beams in short order.

The detail below shows one possibility. It would be perceived as extreme for a residential application in my market. You seem to be afforded a good deal more flexibility in your market however. And who am I kidding? Noboddy's got an indoor curling rink at home where I live. Features of the detail:

1) Keeps the horizontal spanning demand on the wall down. Not sure how 8' was working in previous iterations anyhow.

2) Install a sub-diaphragm six to eight inches below the tops of the beams.

4) Maybe gap the deck edge angle from the wall slightly so the load doesn't start out in the concrete.

5) Change your beam connection detail from wall pocket to embedded plate and double angles. Resistance based on punching shear.








I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources