×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

(OP)
How far do we need to stay away from the tendons? Is it the edge distance specified by the anchor manufacturer or is it specified by ACI?

RE: Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

I know of no formal guidelines. For the tendons, I think that you just need to avoid contact. For the anchors, I guess you'd need to give some thought as to what the concrete voids created by the tendons do to your presumed breakout cones.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

100mm to be sure, to be sure.

If you're using post installed anchors, meaning the slab has been cast, the PT tendons will be hidden and their exact location only revealed by things like GPR, even then there may be some discrepancy.



RE: Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

I usually approach with the question, how far away from the tendons can the design accommodate? I've always called for an inspector to x-ray and mark the surface. Then, I usually spec a 6" offset from the nearest tendon. I never design for anchors into the bottom of beams.

Consider, if anything touches a tendon, it's game over. The tendon is compromised, the slab will probably now be deficient and repairs to tendons are expensive and never leave the slab as good as it was. If we are talking about unbounded, you could even be looking at an explosive failure, requiring, if lucky, a change of pants and a long stay at the nearby bar.

RE: Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

I usually use 6" min as a guide... don't want to get too close.

Dik

RE: Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

(OP)
Thank for the input guys. They are definitely getting the tendons xrayed. I need to request some existing drawings to determine if they are bonded or unbonded, I believe they are unbonded due to previous site photographs but design documents tell the story I want to know.

RE: Post installed anchors in post tension concrete

Quote (Teguci)

Consider, if anything touches a tendon, it's game over. The tendon is compromised, the slab will probably now be deficient and repairs to tendons are expensive and never leave the slab as good as it was. If we are talking about unbounded, you could even be looking at an explosive failure, requiring, if lucky, a change of pants and a long stay at the nearby bar.

The "explosive failure" is a bit of an urban legend, IMO. Granted, when a unbonded tendon is cut/severed it releases its elastic energy suddenly, but often with only a small exit of the strand tail from the stressing-end pocket, or nothing at all, so maybe a intermediate 'loop-failure' at top surface or soffit, with resulting concrete spall.

If an anchorage zone is being chipped out by a contractor, then an 'explosive failure' will likely occur, posing considerable safety issues to the operator and those in close proximity.

Here is a dead-end anchorage that was cored last month - drilled half-depth through the monostrand anchorage, one wedge, and the 7-wire strand released suddenly. Strand projected from the opposing live-end by about 3". Tendon was 50' long.








OP: X-ray is considerably more expensive than GPR scanning (about 5x in my area), and whilst it does give superior images, its cost and safety issues have resulted in that most concrete imaging today utilize GPR. however, GPR needs to undertaken by those experienced with it use and who have knowledge of the structural framing system too. There are considerable numbers of operators who drop $20k on a GPR system and 'sell' themselves as scanning experts, with little or no understanding of structural reinforcement systems.

Also, your 'design documents' may not be too helpful - they may give you how many kips of PT, and some high and low point drapes, and if unbonded - but to get a better appreciation of the PT layout you will need the PT shop drawings - and they can be very difficult to come by, especially for older structures.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources