×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse
2

HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)
Hello,

I hope someone with experience can clear something up for me.

I'm trying to size required DR for a water pipeline under full vacuum. The pipeline will be buried 3m, and I intend to achieve a soil reaction - E' = 2000-3000 psi through material type and high compaction.

Now, when calculating the DR, if the pipe is considered constrained for the entire length a DR 21 pipe will be suitable and achieve a factor of safety of ~2.5-3 for vacuum / soil prism / live loads relative to critical collapse pressure.

However, if the pipe is considered unconstrained, the external pressure of the vacuum exceeds the critical collapse pressure. In the case of unconstrained pipe, DR 13 would be the suitable choice.

My question is, is it safe to assume through diligent supervision of the construction, and tight specifications for the embedment,and primary / secondary fill, that the DR 21 will be sufficient?

Is it common practice to only consider the pipe under constrained conditions for buried pipelines?

Thank you for any help you can provide.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

I don't know what a DR xx is.

... But you seem to be saying that the pipe will collapse in air, with nothing around it, and you are thinking that you can somehow cover it with dirt in such a way as to prevent its collapse?

That sounds improbable to me.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

It is common practice to consider the pipe as constrained when buried, except when soils have very weak cohesion, or liquified, or when pipe is near horizontal or vertical bends and other places where axial pipe forces can become significantly misaligned, or where there are significant changes in wall thicknesses that could cause force imbalance even if the pipe is straight, or near points where the pipe rises above ground and soil forces along the intial buried section are not yet balanced.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Wow.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Not finished yet.

Problem is that is in the axial direction. The collapse mechanism in vacuum is first ovalization in the transverse direction, then local buckling of the pipe wall, so constrained refers to the ability of the soil to prevent local pipe wall buckling, which is dependent on compaction of the soil around the pipe ring itself. If compaction is sufficient to prevent pipe ovalization, vacuum collapse is resisted, however as a means to design to some minimal collapse force there is usually some amount of initial ovalization assumed with construction placement of the pipe itself.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Quote ( )

Is it common practice to only consider the pipe under constrained conditions for buried pipelines?

if the pipe is not buried, than nothing is constraining it? I would try and avoid full vacuum conditions in the pipeline.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Actally if you cannot avoid vacuum, it is better to select a very conservative pipe wall adequate for full vacuum, rather than to count on any soil preventing the ovalization and collapse. Soil gets wet, gets dry, separates from the pipe wall at times. Plus if it does begin to collapse under vacuum, a very significant length may continue to collapse well past the point of initialization. Best to avoid such things.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

I am familiar with collapse of stainless steel tubing under external pressure, and the severe effect that even a little bit of ovalization has on the collapse pressure.
( ... and BTW the noise that the collapse makes. )

I am also familiar with HDPE. I've never seen an HDPE tube that was actually round, and I'd expect an HDPE pipe to be further ovalized during installation, just by supporting it with straps and allowing it to bend under its own weight.

I'd accept that you could stiffen it a bit and limit lateral expansion by encasing it in concrete and making sure it stayed relatively cold, but compacted fill?

This part: "diligent supervision of the construction, and tight specifications for the embedment,and primary / secondary fill" scares me.

I've never seen 'diligent supervision' of _any_ construction.
How do you get that?

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)
BigInch,

Thanks a lot for your reply. Yes, I did assume initial ovalality at install in the calculation.

We were planning to used crushed rock for the primary / secondary backfill ( Haunch and crown), and would cover with geotextile should ground water be present to prevent any soil migration... but there is always risk.

I have read different design briefs which contradict one another on this approach. Some say be conservative and use unconstrained calculation as your method for selection, and others suggest soil reaction forces are adequate to resist collapse under full vacuum.

I guess it comes down to experience, with which I have little in this particular scenario. The increased wall size for the conservative approach is significantly more expensive though.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Look at it this way:
If you overdesign, you might get yelled at for the cost.
If you underdesign, you won't be congratulated for the cost savings,
which will someday surely be more than offset by the cost of replacing the pipe,
and you'll get some really angry phone calls,
and maybe worse.

You decide.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)
Mike,

Yes, I know its counter intuitive regarding the soil pressure.

In regards to over designing: Yes, I agree with you and this is how I would typically do it... Never been congratulated after working hard to save money...but i'd really like to try for this one. Its likely just not worth it though.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Sounds like you're trying to balance the cost of a piece of pipe today with that of maintaining your future reputation. Tough one.
Is it really that much money???

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

The design guide I use a lot states that a negative differential of 1 bar of unsupported PE 100 is Ok for DR 17 up to 1 year and 0.9 bar differential for 50 years.

PE80 is I think a lot worse than that. I have a little chart somewhere which proves the point, but can't lay my hands on it at a weekend.

3% initial ovalisation sounds a lot to me and might be a significant conservatism.

I can't really see backfill providing sufficient resistence.

How often and how long does this negative pressure apply? Thee are significant time issues with PE - my guide has DR21 being good for 1 bar differential ofr a day, but not for a month.

Most issues come from pipes laid in water which are empty or gas filled, but at a pressure < water pressure.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)
Littleinch,

I'm familiar with the table you are referring to, or at least I have one that is similar, but it is based on unconstrained conditions I believe.

I didnt mention this earlier, but the system will be in -7 PSI gauge always as its a syphon at the lowest pressure zone, but I have considered it as full vacuum to be conservative. One thing I failed to mention as well is that this pipeline will be buried 3m underground.

I didn't explain the mechanics of this very well in my original post as I was seeking information from someone with experience for such a design and they wouldn't require it ( As Biginch demonstrated)

As explained by Biginch, in the 5th post down, collapse occurs first through ovalization. Once the pipe has vertically deflected enough, it will dimple inward and collapse. Now, the major axis of the ellipse (oval) must expand outward for this to occur, but the soil resists this movement. The amount of soil resistance can be increased through high compaction and material selection of the primary / second fill (fill around the pipe).

If I use crushed gravel or coarse-grained soils with no fines and compact this to 95% SPD it will provide a soil reaction modulus of 2000-3000 psi. At the 3000 psi soil reaction the calculations tell me that I have a about a 4 factor of safety under full vacuum and soil load (initial ovalization not accounted for yet), using DR 21( Recall i'm only at ~ -7 psi and this would actually be 5.8).

It is not a matter of will soil provide collapse resistance against this is or not. It absolutely will. I guess it comes down to reliability of the pipe encasement. Can I trust it given all the conservation I add afterwards?

So using this method, how much soil support do I need before collapse will occur? Well If i consider full vacuum at 100 years design interval, the soil support would have to drop from 3000 psi (design) to 200 psi.

Perhaps if I used a light cement / sand mixture around my pipe I could ensure this would not happen? I dont know.. thats why i'm here. I was really hoping to find someone who has enough experience in this area to tell me that yes, you can do this if you ensure X,X+1,.... or for someone to tell me i'm completely mad. So far, the people who have told me that this will not work dont actually have experience in the design of flexible pipelines, and are unaware of the failure mechanism in collapse nor the resistance soil provides to such failure.

I mean no disrespect here as three years ago I would have agreed with the statement below.

"... But you seem to be saying that the pipe will collapse in air, with nothing around it, and you are thinking that you can somehow cover it with dirt in such a way as to prevent its collapse?
That sounds improbable to me."

but i'm not going to base any decision on opinion.

Another important point, the area where we are building will never encounter any seismic activity which could compromise the soil enclosure.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Have you seen this?

http://www.vinidex.com.au/technical/pvc-pressure-p...

Have you considered additional constraints such as straps or sections of thicker pipe in between thinner pipe?

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

ubique,

BI has given a good explanation of the reality of life in buried pipes - in many locations neither fully restrained or unrestrained. Most people like to think that a buried pipeline just sits there and doesn't move. In many places that is not correct....

I personally think what you're proposing will be sufficient, especially as you have a factor of safety of 2 before you even start if you're considering full vacuum , but actually only 7 psi difference.

This issue therefore is what level of satisfaction / factor of safety are you after??

A lot also depends on the particular circumstances / locations where you're getting this low pressure.

Is the pipe subject to other stress and forces such thermal expansion or contraction. elastic bending, any formed bends??

If the pipe section you're looking at is flat, straight, long and has no or little thermal expansion then I think you can look at fully restrained.

Anything else and the chances are you will generate some gap over time around the pipe to the extent that it has room to move.

Hence my suggestion that you look at some sections of thicker pipe or add some re-inforcement in the way of metal bands or straps?

Let us know how it goes

LI

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Has anyone mentioned vacuum breaker so the line can't go under vacuum?

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)

Quote (BigInch (Petroleum) 21 Jan 17 09:35 Sounds like you're trying to balance the cost of a piece of pipe today with that of maintaining your future reputation. Tough one. Is it really that much money??? )


I didn't notice this before, but literally laughed out loud as this is essentially what I'm saying in my post. But don't we all to some degree balance our reputation with design cost? FYI: ~2.5x the cost.

LI & BI,

Thank you both for your posts, you have been very helpful.

Yes, I was going to use thicker pipe around the two major bends and at crossings where soil support is unavailable due to auger bore installation. The pipeline is mostly straight flat, and no significant thermal expansion.

I do like the idea of band reinforcement though, particularly to both reinforce and isolate the two sections where relatively high pressure drops exist, and at the interface of pipe thickness transition. This will likely be much cheaper and easier than concrete encasement.

I consulted with an old professor today regarding the issue. He suggested it would be reasonable to include soil support as long as I really know my soil and ensure consistent support throughout in addition to some of the advise which you both provided.

Looks like its a go, I'll be sure to update once complete. Thanks again.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)
Artisi,

Its a siphon.

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Wow. Good one. That siphon answer short-sheeted Artisi pretty quickly.

Comeon, it's not $2.5MM right. You've got to be practical sometimes.
You're heart's in the right place, not sure about your head, or is it the reverse? smile

Reaction to change doesn't stop it smile

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

(OP)

Quote (BigInch (Petroleum) 22 Jan 17 13:19 Wow. Good one. That siphon answer short-sheeted Artisi pretty quickly. Comeon, it's not $2.5MM right. You've got to be practical sometimes. You're heart's in the right place, not sure about your head, or is it the reverse? smile)


I'm not too sure what you mean here, but what I meant was: DR13 Pipe Cost = DR21 Pipe Cost * 2.5

RE: HDPE Under Full Vacuum - Constrained Pipe Resistance to Collapse

Sorry, I wanted to say that as an engineer you should do as I believe you are doing and always strive to make an optimum design, balancing functionality and serviceability with cost, but there are few other factors that can enter the equation, such as when we don't have infinite knowledge, all the relevant information, privy to all the same knowledge of the owner, or Mother Nature's guarantee that 3000 psf soil will always hold 3000 psf. We often have to add some fudge to account for some unknowns or another, which usually adds expense, but the advantage is that we get to sleep a bit better at night hoping we added just enough so that the result was still an optimum design (even better than before), and the extra functionality was worth the cost trade off. Keep up your good intentions, without making false economies, especially at only your own expense. They will pat you on the back when you save them a buck, but take that same buck again ... with interest, out of your hide, should something happen later.

Engineering they say can be more difficult than doctoring. A patient dies and the doctor is rewarded by a quick burial. A bridge falls down and is often still on public display years afterward.

Reaction to change doesn't stop it smile

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources