×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AISC Chapter C-Stability analysis methods

AISC Chapter C-Stability analysis methods

AISC Chapter C-Stability analysis methods

(OP)
So, Chapter C gives 3 analysis methods and I'm wondering if anybody out there has experience with the 2 alternative methods. I usually use the direct analysis method, but am curious when it might be useful to use the effective length or first-order analysis methods. When are those more advantageous than the DDM? What are the pros and cons of each? Let me know your thoughts because I'd like a little practical advice to make sure I'm using the correct analysis method in the appropriate situation. Thanks everybody,

RE: AISC Chapter C-Stability analysis methods

They're only advantageous if you don't want to use a computer to calculate second order effects. If you look at the assumptions involved you'll find that they're not very accurate for a typical multi-story building and really should only be used for simple structures. That said, I use the effective length method for single story structures all the time as it is nice and fast and second order effects can almost always be all but neglected. With modern software though it's pretty much no advantage over the direct analysis method in terms of speed.

Here's a great, but brief, introduction to the effective length method: http://media.aisc.org/NASCC2014/140327-N40A.mp4

Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: AISC Chapter C-Stability analysis methods

One thing I notice is some people have a hard time understanding what to do when they get divergence for a DA Method Analysis. In those cases, it is often useful to switch back to something like those other two methods. They will usually find that they need to reduce drift or better brace some columns or the like.

I guess what I'm saying is that a first order analysis or an effective length method analysis can be easier to investigate if the DA method has you stymied.

RE: AISC Chapter C-Stability analysis methods

Josh does make a good point; it's often a lot harder to verify by hand that second order effects are being applied appropriately by the "black box". Running an effective length analysis can make a good double check to ensure a feasible design.

Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources